Not finding a clarification on the internet for this. Replaced an exhaust manifold on a 98 Civic. Used existing O2 sensor, it was working fine with the old manifold. It has "backed out" 3 times after about 3-4 warm-up cycles, no matter how much I tighten (quite enough for a normal sensor thread I'm certain). Is there a suitable "thread locker" that I can use on this? I am suspecting the manifold has "made in China" disease (i.e. out-of-spec threads) and can return it but just to get the same problem?
I'm accepting any qualified advice! To do it right, I'll even take the new manifold off, get my $ back and try a different brand but would like to avoid if possible.
Update: So I finally met with the manager who had another manifold brought in. It was clear that the manifold I received had not been properly bored out to the full depth which allowed the end of the sensor to be crushed and the remaining extra contact/vibration was backing the sensor out. They gave me the other manifold and ordered me a new sensor at n/c. Beaverton Auto Parts will keep my business. However, this is another example of poor Chinese quality. In many aspects they have made significant gains but, at their low cost of labor, this was likely a manual operation. In the U.S., this would have been done on a CNC which would have maintained better quality. Sad state of affairs.
Thanks,
BB
I'm accepting any qualified advice! To do it right, I'll even take the new manifold off, get my $ back and try a different brand but would like to avoid if possible.
Update: So I finally met with the manager who had another manifold brought in. It was clear that the manifold I received had not been properly bored out to the full depth which allowed the end of the sensor to be crushed and the remaining extra contact/vibration was backing the sensor out. They gave me the other manifold and ordered me a new sensor at n/c. Beaverton Auto Parts will keep my business. However, this is another example of poor Chinese quality. In many aspects they have made significant gains but, at their low cost of labor, this was likely a manual operation. In the U.S., this would have been done on a CNC which would have maintained better quality. Sad state of affairs.
Thanks,
BB