IFish Fishing Forum banner
1 - 9 of 706 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
7,828 Posts
…can anyone explain why there was not a recount on 114?
because the cost of a voter-initiated recount per county is to be borne by the voter; as the margin is greater than ,2% no automatic recount is warranted per Oregon Revised Statute
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,828 Posts
This is ridiculous.
not participating in voting can have consequences 🤔🤷‍♂️

it’s reallly not that hard to fill in the oval next to “No” and put the pre-stamped envelope Into the mailbox after signing it 🤔
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,828 Posts
It works!!!!

I don't get this part.......

"Defendants paid Plaintiff a $60,000 retainer for Plaintiff’s initial work on the lawsuit. Plaintiff then worked on the lawsuit for several months, including seeking the requested emergency injunctive relief for Defendants. The retainer was thus exhausted through that work by Plaintiff."

When was the retainer paid? The contract was not fully executed until Nov.21st. Was there work being done prior to the contract being in place between Kaemph and OFF?

How could there have been "several months" work if the measure was not even approved until Nov. 8th?

-E-
perhaps by game-planning for multiple outcomes prior to the actual outcome being known? 🤓

It’s called being paid to think 🤔
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,828 Posts
Loper have you ever divulged what it is that you do? You seem to have an inside track on state issues. ????

-E-
No, although there exist a few who’ve figured it out 🤔

that fact has nothing to do with this lawsuit; one side believes they should get paid for thinking, which is what they generally do; sucks to be them that they didn’t have a contract in place to be paid for thinking; frivolous lawsuits occur every day; just laugh at it 🤓
 
  • Like
Reactions: nehalemguy
1 - 9 of 706 Posts
Top