Joined
·
869 Posts
Hey Cagey -- for minimal confusion, please change the topic to "fin clip law" instead of "fin lip law"...
:cheers:
Blind Squirrel
:cheers:
Blind Squirrel
<font size="2" face="verdana,arial,helvetica">I agree. It seems to me the lack of consistency in enforcement is a significant issue and one that causes some grief. If one officer lets you get away with it but the next dosen't, ill feelings are compounded.Originally posted by Fishplay:
There is no doubt in my mind the fish in the photo is a clipped fish.
That said....the charter boat captain that allowed that fish to be kept should have been ticketed not sternly warned.
The law is " removed in it's entirety, with healed scar".
I'm in support of changing the way the law reads so fish like those in the picture can be retained legally.
Untill that time the law should be enforced as it reads.....and it's pretty clear and easily interpreted.
<font size="2" face="verdana,arial,helvetica">This is true. That was my thoughts in my original post above.I agree. It seems to me the lack of consistency in enforcement is a significant issue and one that causes some grief. If one officer lets you get away with it but the next dosen't, ill feelings are compounded.
By changing the law we may be able to gain some consistency as well.