IFish Fishing Forum banner
21 - 40 of 145 Posts
1-9 twist.

I know some aren’t but I’ve always been more than happy with Pac-Nor barrels.



Owl
 
What ever happened to the good 'ol 30-06 and 180gr. Core-Lokts? 🤷

The deadliest mushroom in the woods. šŸ˜‰
It's been phased out by the 7.6 Creedmoor.

 
I flip back and forth between my 270 and 243 for both mule deer and black tail.

We have mule deer tags this year and I'm taking the 30-30. Have yet to take a deer with it. Have a few spots we watch that are less than 100 yards long that the deer like to use to cross in. Hoping to sit and one crosses in range.
 
What ever happened to the good 'ol 30-06 and 180gr. Core-Lokts? 🤷

The deadliest mushroom in the woods. šŸ˜‰
Why shoot a 20+ ft-lb recoiling rifle with 85+ year old bullet tech when a 10 ft-lb recoiling rifle and modern bullet tech can achieve the same or better terminal results? Heavier recoil makes you a worse shooter and worse hunter. Not as accurate, not as easy to spot your own impacts, and not able to practice as much compared to a lighter recoiling cartridge in a similar weight rifle.

Selling my 30-06 was the best thing I ever did. Partially because it was a *** Savage that I replaced with a Tikka, lol.

Wonder if this dude with is .300 WM spotted his impact? (he picks his head up like a gopher to see what happened after most shots).

Image


Also, your .30 cal lead core bullets are neutered to do less damage than they're capable of. Kinda like buying a Ferrari with a 80 MPH limiter on it...what's the point?? lol
 
Why shoot a 20+ ft-lb recoiling rifle with 85+ year old bullet tech when a 10 ft-lb recoiling rifle and modern bullet tech can achieve the same or better terminal results? Heavier recoil makes you a worse shooter and worse hunter. Not as accurate, not as easy to spot your own impacts, and not able to practice as much compared to a lighter recoiling cartridge in a similar weight rifle.

Selling my 30-06 was the best thing I ever did. Partially because it was a *** Savage that I replaced with a Tikka, lol.

Wonder if this dude with is .300 WM spotted his impact? (he picks his head up like a gopher to see what happened after most shots).

View attachment 1075211

Also, your .30 cal lead core bullets are neutered to do less damage than they're capable of. Kinda like buying a Ferrari with a 80 MPH limiter on it...what's the point?? lol
I’d like to see your bullet post game impact.
 
Come on man! I understand that younger men today can't handle recoil like previous generations, but I was a 140# 13 year old shooting one. Didn't bother me so much and I killed a lot of animals with it. Accuracy was not an issue. It was a Christmas present when I was 12. I'm 61 now and not sure of that guns future after I leave this world.

I do have one of those limp wristed low recoil 6.5's that's fun to shoot way out there though, too. 🤠
 
I'm looking for a 4x or 1x4, maybe 2x7 scope for a .300 Savage mdl. 99 that has been in the family for as long as I can remember. It would be fun to carry.
 
I kinda efed up the other Thread by not Specific enough

Deer ,BT,MD,WT other.Seems as generations age, things change .
Seems lots of older Calibers are coming back strong .With more BC,powders etc.They still work .

your one choice for Deer šŸ¤”
I love my 6.5x55 swede loaded to full potential in a modern rifle. The 6.5 creed is great too. both have heavy bullet twists.
Forget the .260 Remington. The twist is for lighter bullet.
 
Why shoot a 20+ ft-lb recoiling rifle with 85+ year old bullet tech when a 10 ft-lb recoiling rifle and modern bullet tech can achieve the same or better terminal results? Heavier recoil makes you a worse shooter and worse hunter. Not as accurate, not as easy to spot your own impacts, and not able to practice as much compared to a lighter recoiling cartridge in a similar weight rifle.

Selling my 30-06 was the best thing I ever did. Partially because it was a *** Savage that I replaced with a Tikka, lol.

Wonder if this dude with is .300 WM spotted his impact? (he picks his head up like a gopher to see what happened after most shots).

View attachment 1075211

Also, your .30 cal lead core bullets are neutered to do less damage than they're capable of. Kinda like buying a Ferrari with a 80 MPH limiter on it...what's the point?? lol
Tradition and confidence if recoil was a concern yes I’d hang the cleats.
 
I'm looking for a 4x or 1x4, maybe 2x7 scope for a .300 Savage mdl. 99 that has been in the family for as long as I can remember. It would be fun to carry.
I have several variable scopes in the range you describe, plus 1-4, 2-7 and some fixed power scopes. They all serve me very well. My most powerful scope is a 2.5-8 Leupold,

For almost 20 years my favorite rifle scope combo was a fixed 4x on a pre-64 Model 70 in .270. Basically, a Jack OConnor special.

Over the years I have had two model 99's, one carbine in 250-3000 and another in .308. The .308 was a 99 featherweight and kicked brutally with the downturned comb of the stock. I sold it. The carbine had a fat Beavertail forend and was ill-fitting in a saddle scabbard. Plus the 250-3000 only shot light bullets well. Later the 250-Savage had the twist for heavier bullets, I sold my 250-3000

Going back 50 years ago, I became close friends with a Native American living on tribal land in an adobe home his grandfather built two years after WW1 ended, which was when the Savage 99 came out in the 300 Savage. His grandfather bought one,

That rifle was in its third generation of use then, and for 50 years it hung above the fireplace in that old adobe home.
How many family members and friends borrowed it to hunt deer with, and how many deer were killed with it cannot be counted.

Once a month his grandfather would take his family, wife, son and daughter, to the mission for several days in a horsedrawn wagon, with a saddle horse tied behind. Natives had absolutely no rights or legal protection then.

His grandfather always brought that Savagev99 in 300 Savage along to protect his wife and daughter.
 
BT and MD are very different deer. I wouldn’t use the same cartridge on a 150 lb deer at 40 yards as I would on a 250lb deer at 200 yards. You certainly can, but I don’t.
If those were guaranteed parameters you could fine tune. But, what happens when you're brush hunting and happen to spot a great buck way down in a hole or cross-canyon, 400+ yards away? It's happened to me more than once. And I've killed them. I carry a .270 Win with a 3-9 Zeiss scope, sighted in for 400 yds, 130 TSX's. No problem making running shots in close, very effective at 500.
 
21 - 40 of 145 Posts