I have been somewhat involved with this since the emergency closure which was due to more rapid deterioration than projected by a professional engineering group. The replacement project has gone through public input with Parks' Staff acknowledging that they are obligated to replace it with another fishing pier. Subsequent designs were narrowed down to two with both having a long pier out to the edge of deep water with one ending in what I will describe as a hammerhead and the other with a 90 degree right turn then paralleling deep water providing maximum rail space to prime fishing pretty much as the current structure. Parks then went out for permits to have geotech work done to determine what the beach could support. Those permits were approved and the engineering work completed. Last I heard Parks was having more design work accomplished. Guess I need to follow up with Staff for the latest and to make sure the interests of local pier fishers are met. Then there will be the issue of Corps of Engineer permitting followed by trying to obtain funding.
Editorial Comment: This is a perfect example of why any type of marine project needs to be started far in advance of the point where the structure is deemed unsafe and access denied - especially when it was built with State grant money as a fishing pier.