If the pipeline is a bad idea, let's hear why.
THE CHALLENGES OF FURTHER COST REDUCTIONS
FOR NEW SUPPLY OPTIONS (PIPELINE, LNG, GTL)
Sylvie Cornot-Gandolphe, International Energy Agency Alexandre Rojey, Institut Français du Pétrole and CEDIGAZ
Olivier Appert, International Energy Agency
Ralf Dickel, International Energy Agency
Marie-Françoise Chabrelie, CEDIGAZ
Jack I googled the main participants of this conference and it would appear they are the ones that would stand to profit the most from LNG transporting.
Got any information from a unbiased source?
These gas brokers, the state of Alaska and the oil companies, stand to make the most profit from this LNG tanker scheme.
So what's in it for Oregon? Why did California reject the LNG terminal plan?
How is a pipeline through Oregon to California a better idea?