The Oregonian's Bill Monroe!

Go Back   www.ifish.net > Ifish Fishing and Hunting > Ifish Community

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-14-2004, 04:21 PM   #1
birdhunter
Tuna!
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: PRE, Oregon
Posts: 1,279
Default Conflict of Interests?

You may have noticed in your copy of the Oregonian today - at least in Metro south - that PGE plans on revamping the fish ladder at River Mill Dam on the Clackamas. ODFW has been working very closely with PGE to improve fish passage for some time now. The interest may be due in no small part to the fact that PGE project engineer John Esler also holds another title unmentioned in the newspaper article: ODFW Commission Chair.

Now, I certainly am no hydroelectrical engineer, nor a fisheries biologist, but the inclusion of a Commission member (the head Commissioner no less) who plays a major role with the regulator and the permitee, disturbs me. Granted, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is the one issuing the permit, but my biggest concern, taken from what little I do know of this situation, is that ODFW staff may be reticent to advise more strenuous fish passage efforts from PGE if it costs their boss's boss too much.

I was hoping that one here on ifish, who perhaps knows more about the situation than yours truly, might be able to shed some light on what, at face value, appears to me to be a fishy situation.


A link to the article can be found here or just below


PGE plans to ease fish passage

Improvements at hydroelectric dams on the Clackamas River would make it easier for salmon and steelhead to migrate

01/14/04

JIM KADERA

ESTACADA -- Portland General Electric plans to spend up to $9 million to improve salmon and You may have noticed in your copy of the Oregonian today - at least in Metro south - that PGE plans on revamping the fish ladder at River Mill Dam on the Clackamas. ODFW has been working very closely with PGE to improve fish passage for some time now. The interest may be due in no small part to the fact that PGE project engineer John Esler also holds another title: ODFW Commisson Chair.

Now, I certinally am no hydroelectrical engineer, nor a fisheries biologist, but the inlcusion of a Commission member (the head Commissioner no less) who plays a major role with the permitee and permiter, disturbs me. My biggest concern, taken from what little I do know of this situation, is that ODFW staff may be relicient to advise more strenouous fish passage efforts from PGE if it costs their boss's boss too much.winter steelhead trout passage at hydroelectric dams on the upper Clackamas River.

It will be the first large-scale upgrade of fish ladders and other systems to help fish pass the massive barriers since the four PGE dams were constructed between 1907 and 1958.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has asked for written public comments by Jan. 31 on a permit that would allow PGE to build a new fish ladder and improve the fishway at River Mill Dam near Estacada. River Mill, built in 1911, is the first dam adult fish confront as they swim upstream to spawn.

"We've been working on this with PGE for quite a while," said John Zauner, a hydropower coordinator with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife in Clackamas. "The new fish ladder will improve fish passage tremendously."

John Esler, PGE project engineer, said the dam is not meeting passage requirements set by fish agencies. "The fish ladder at River Mill is almost vertical," he said.

The ladder was modified in 1973 and again after that but is still inadequate, Zauner said. The new ladder will have a more gradual slope to ease migrants upstream. It will also have a better flow of water to attract fish to take that route around the dam. Now, some fish delay before passing or try to spawn downstream, Zauner said.

"The spillway will be reconfigured so when (downstream migrating juvenile) fish come out, they will have a smoother ride down to the streambed," Esler said.

The new design will keep smolts from sometimes being plunged against river rocks.

The River Mill work will be a result of the Federal Energy Regulation Commission amending the license for PGE's Clackamas Basin dams last June. The utility filed for an amended license in 2001.

Esler said additional improvements at two or three dams upstream of River Mill will be proposed when the utility files in August with the energy commission to relicense the dams.

A 30-year license covering the River Mill, Faraday, North Fork and Oak Grove dams expires in August 2006.

The North Fork dam and reservoir have another problem to overcome. Because water is drawn from the reservoir bottom to propel the dam turbine generators, there isn't enough current near the top of the reservoir to push smolts downstream. One of the options being studied is to draw water from the upper zone used by the young fish, Esler said.

The improvements at all of the dams will cost an estimated $8 million to $9 million, he said. The River Mill work will be completed in 2005. Some of the other improvements will begin soon after relicensing is completed in 2006, but there is no schedule, Esler said.

With hydropower licenses commonly extending for 30 to 50 years, state and federal fish agencies often look at the relicensing period as an opportunity to push for environmental gains. PGE a few years ago began studying how to strengthen fish passage on the Clackamas.

"We realize the public and fish agencies wanted these improvements, so we decided that rather than fight, we would get started early with the engineering before we were up for relicensing," Esler said.

PGE needs to show it will make improvements because spring chinook and winter steelhead are on the federal list of threatened species. Wild coho are listed as endangered by the state and are a candidate for federal listing.

A copy of the public notice showing the River Mill work in detail can be obtained by calling the corps in Portland at 503-808-4385.
__________________
Is this your homework Larry?
birdhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 04:30 PM   #2
Point-of-Sale Clerk
Ifish Nate
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: McMinnville
Posts: 2,964
Default Re: Conflict of Interests?

Usually he recuses himself when a vote is needed regarding anything to do with PG&E. I have been in attendance at a commission meeting when he would recuse himself and then make a presentation. (that was before he was the Chairman)

Conflict of interests happen all the time but generally it is handled very well with the exception of the Citizen Advisory Groups who never get instructions from ODFW as to what is acceptable. (the R&E board comes to mind) :grin:
Point-of-Sale Clerk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 07:32 PM   #3
GutshotApe
Ifish Nate
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Junction City
Posts: 2,258
Default Re: Conflict of Interests?

Quote:
Originally posted by birdhunter:
.....ODFW staff may be reticent to advise more strenuous fish passage efforts from PGE if it costs their boss's boss too much.....
<font size="2" face="verdana,arial,helvetica">This situation is somewhat unusual. In theory, one might imagine some sort of potential conflict because Esler is the current F&W commission chairman and is also employed by PGE to work on relicensing issues.

Could the proposed fish passage modifications be improved by using a more expensive design? I don't know. Would ODFW biologists and staff compromise their professional integrity to save PGE money? I doubt it. Would Esler pressure ODFW staff to recommend an inferior plan to save PGE money? I doubt that, too.

Without something more than an abstract theory that Esler's dual role in the issue might affect the outcome...without something to indicate ODFW's staff has compromised their integrity by treating this issue differently because of Esler's day job... ...I just don't see anything to be "disturbed" about.

There is plenty of outside scrutiny of relicensing issues. I am comfortable that nothing underhanded is going on.
__________________
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum...........A.Bierce
GutshotApe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 08:35 PM   #4
freespool
King Salmon
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: woodstock
Posts: 10,514
Default Re: Conflict of Interests?

Here's a new idea for PGE,remove the RiverMill dam altogether. This prehestoric behemoth has long out lived any usefulness. It's a fish blocker of the tenth magnatude. The miniscule amount of power this dam produces is not worth the harm it causes anadramous fish.


salmon hugger
__________________
salmon hugger





"A curious thing happens when fish stocks decline: People who aren't aware of the old levels accept the new ones as normal. Over generations, societies adjust their expectations downward to match prevailing conditions." Kennedy Wame
freespool is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 09:19 PM   #5
TGFwriter
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tillamook
Posts: 128
Default Re: Conflict of Interests?

Dog gone salmon huggin' greenie! Next thing you'll want is larger riparian areas! Go hug your salmon somewhere else! :grin:
TGFwriter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 09:23 PM   #6
GutshotApe
Ifish Nate
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Junction City
Posts: 2,258
Default Re: Conflict of Interests?

Freespool - That's not a new idea...its what PGE opted to do with Marmot Dam on the Sandy...because the cost of keeping the dam exceeded the benefits. However, Marmot Dam served a useful public purpose (besides generating electricity) by allowed sorting of wild fish (to be passed upstream) and hatchery fish (taken out...or taken back down river for another pass) and the Rube Goldberg hydro generating system created Roslyn Lake. Now, as I understand it, without the dam the Sandy River hatchery program will be in serious jeopardy and Roslyn Lake, a popular family picnic & fishing venue, will either be drained or reduced to a small pond.

I don't know much about PGE's Clackamas dams but one would assume that if the cost of keeping them (and making fish passage more effective) doesn't exceed the power generation benefits to PGE and the public, the dam will stay. The existing fish passage may not be perfect...but doesn't the upper Clackamas have some fairly strong runs of anadromous fish?

Regardless, I think Mr.Esler would probably declare a conflict of interest and abstain from voting... If ODFW staff doesn't hold PGE's feet to the fire and recommend a reasonable, effective and optimal improvement, Oregon Trout and others will no doubt scream "FOUL!"...not to mention the other 6 F&W commissioners.

So relax.
__________________
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum...........A.Bierce
GutshotApe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 10:53 PM   #7
mophile
Cutthroat
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Gresham
Posts: 30
Default Re: Conflict of Interests?

Quote:
Originally posted by GutshotApe:
...but doesn't the upper Clackamas have some fairly strong runs of anadromous fish?

<font size="2" face="verdana,arial,helvetica">...Which brings me to a question I have meant to ask for a while. I used to (pre-98) fish the upper Clack, but have been away for a while. Does anything make it up there, and if so, what? Winter run steelhead? Summer runs? Resident trout used to be VERY slim pickins, and I heard they stopped planting altogether. What's up there?
mophile is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Cast to



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:37 PM.

Terms of Service
Page generated in 0.10156 seconds with 10 queries