 |
03-20-2004, 04:35 PM
|
#1
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bayshore
Posts: 4,197
|
March 18-19 gillnet take?
Has anyone seen the results of the commercial take over the last scheduled netting? :whazzup:
__________________
"A cheerful heart is good medicine."
|
|
|
03-20-2004, 04:42 PM
|
#2
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 38,765
|
Re: March 18-19 gillnet take?
The results through th 17th are at Columbia River Compact Fact Sheet . Preliminary results from Thursday/Friday might be available Monday. There should be an announcement in the next day or so about the next open date.
__________________
Report Game Violations!
Washington: 1 877 933-9847
Oregon: 1 800 452-7888
|
|
|
03-20-2004, 04:59 PM
|
#3
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bayshore
Posts: 4,197
|
Re: March 18-19 gillnet take?
Thanks, Pete. I was wondering if their catch took a nose dive too.
__________________
"A cheerful heart is good medicine."
|
|
|
03-20-2004, 05:04 PM
|
#4
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 3,974
|
Re: March 18-19 gillnet take?
Why do I think that maybe there catch didn't take a nose dive, and that's why we're seeing ours take one? :depressed:
|
|
|
03-20-2004, 09:25 PM
|
#5
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,157
|
Re: March 18-19 gillnet take?
March 18 and 19 landings in the CR were 832 chinook.
Clam
__________________
Coastal
Clam
Association
|
|
|
03-21-2004, 04:08 AM
|
#6
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bayshore
Posts: 4,197
|
Re: March 18-19 gillnet take?
Thank you, Clamman. :smile: That number is really close to the number from the other day. So,it looks like the "bite" is off rather than the lack of fish.
__________________
"A cheerful heart is good medicine."
|
|
|
03-21-2004, 06:24 AM
|
#7
|
|
Steelhead
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 344
|
Re: March 18-19 gillnet take?
"Sport Fishery
· The mainstem Columbia (mouth to Bonneville Dam) chinook sports catch estimate for
the period of Feb. 1 - March 16 was 692 fish kept and 164 released in 23,100 angler trips,
for an impact rate of 0.009%. The steelhead sports catch for the same period was 291
fish kept and 271 fish released."
This number seems high to me - I can't see more than half of their estimate being landed in that time frame. So our quota has already been reduced by that amount.
__________________
You should fish the same way you eat in a public restaurant, without annoying anyone, and without forgetting your manners.
Unknown
Member # 3419
|
|
|
03-21-2004, 06:48 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member at Large
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 9 degrees north latitude...
Posts: 23,770
|
Re: March 18-19 gillnet take?
I do not think that their catch affects our quota unless they exceed their quota. Hopefully, they will be able to catch their share of fish without going over their alloted wild fish impact quota.
__________________
Goin' where the sun keeps shinin' through the pouring rain
Goin' where the weather suits my clothes...
Pura Vida
|
|
|
03-21-2004, 07:05 AM
|
#9
|
|
Steelhead
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 344
|
Re: March 18-19 gillnet take?
Read it again.....notice the part that says "SPORT FISHERY"?
that's right, SPORTS FISHERY. What this means is that they claim that the sports fishery has already taken 692 chinook and 291 steelhead. Those numbers seem exaggerated to me, and they go straight to the bottom line - the number of fish in the sport quota. What I see is a greatly exaggerated sport estimate, and a greatly reduced commercial estimate, but we should be used to it by now.
__________________
You should fish the same way you eat in a public restaurant, without annoying anyone, and without forgetting your manners.
Unknown
Member # 3419
|
|
|
03-21-2004, 07:16 AM
|
#10
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 38,765
|
Re: March 18-19 gillnet take?
There isn't a quota, per se , for sport fishers. We are permitted to fish until we reach an impact level on ESA listed chinook or ESA listed steelhead. Theoretically, we could catch all the hatchery fish in the river without exceeding our impact if we never hooked and released any wild fish. We aren't likely to run into any problems with steelhead, but we could with listed chinooks. Our impact rate allowed for chinooks is 0.12%. 0.009% is our impact to date. That sounds like we have used 7.5% of our allowable impact. The original expectation was that our impact allowances would keep the sport fishery open through April. It looks like that might have been a conservative projection unless we start catching a whole lot of fish soon.
__________________
Report Game Violations!
Washington: 1 877 933-9847
Oregon: 1 800 452-7888
|
|
|
03-21-2004, 01:23 PM
|
#11
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bayshore
Posts: 4,197
|
Re: March 18-19 gillnet take?
Those numbers do look a little high.  The effort has been solid over the last week, but catch has been below average. Guess I'll be fishing late in May with the way things are turning out this year.
__________________
"A cheerful heart is good medicine."
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|