I saw a report by Grant Mcome on TV and he says its a very bad thing.
Beach closeures for the next 25 years if it goes thru.
Nothing anyone can say to me will change my mind on this issue.
This will affect EVERYONE including fishermen!
JUST SAY NO !
Cap Den and Marie Will
> READ THIS
> Did you know:
> There are currently talks of closing 57 miles of
> Oregon beaches to preserve a species of bird called
> the Western Snowy Plover. these will be closed from
> March -September and some year round for up to 25
> years!!!! This bird is more common in the South Coast
> of Oregon to Baja California. And has likely always
> been rare this far North.
> Here is the big problem, these beaches will be closed
> to walking, jogging, kyting, dogs and just about
> anything during the summer even though there is no
> proof that humans impact the WSP survival.
> It is proven that European beach grass, a non-native
> species brought in by the very government institution
> now trying to implement this new plan, along with
> development and other habitat alterations and of
> course PREDATION, is biggest hurdle these birds face.
>
> But in 1992 one year before ESA listed the Plover as
> endangered there were just 30 birds on the oregon
> coast now there are little over 100. Infact a Parks
> and recreation update stated that 2003 was the "most
> successful breeding seasons in a number of years"
> Oregon produced at least 59 fledglings, almost double
> the number in the past two years. Proof to me that
> their numbers are naturally on the incline.
> Also portions of Coos Bay County beaches have been
> closed since 1993 and their county Commisioners are
> currently filing Lawsuit against the Snowy Plover
> Critical Habitat Designation under the Endangered
> Species Act. their claim is that Coos County has had
> severe job losses and economic depression in many
> sectors of its industry as a result of the restraints
> on the economy because of the current implementation
> of the ESA beach closures.
> in regards to this case Seattle's Audubon Society
> printed an open letter to Coos County in which this
> was stated:
> "If successful, your county's suit will directly
> benefit two narrow interest groups (1) advocates of
> motorized access to West Coast beaches, and (2)
> developers who need Federal funds or permits to build
> on parcels of privately owned ocean front property."
> Neither I nor any parties equally enraged by the
> possible closures that I know of, fall under any of
> these 2 catagories. We simply want the use of our
> beaches for recreation which is our right under Oregon
> Law.
> It's interesting that predators account for 68% of
> nest losses while Human Impact account for just
> 2%.(Predecisional Enviromental Assessment, Predator
> Damage Management to Protect the Federally Threatened
> Pacific Coast Population of the WEstern Snowy Plover,
> Oregon, USDA Wildlife Services,2001) that 68% doesn't
> even include adult plovers or their chicks taken by
> predators. European beach grass control and predator
> control have proven very affective in increasing
> plover populations in California.
> It should also be noted that there is currently
> captive breeding programs being used in which
> Biologist "invade" the plover nest four or more times
> during nesting. they claim that not one nest has been
> lost to these activities. Yet they want the public to
> believe that walking 185 feet from the nest is the
> cause of a depleted plover population (laughable also
> because the population is shown to be on the rise)
> So why are we being told that we can't enjoy our
> beaches!!!!!!!!!!!
> Let the government know you will not stand for any
> more useless spending or unnecessary beach closures.
> let them know you want them to try more reasonable
> solutions.
> contact:
>
OSMP.HCP@state.or.us
>
>
oregon@gsmith.senate.gov
>
>
senator@wyden.senate.gov
>
>
darlene@mail.house.gov
>
> __________________________________
[ 03-16-2004, 08:20 PM: Message edited by: Captain and Marie ]