 |
01-08-2004, 06:46 PM
|
#1
|
|
Fry
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: or
Posts: 9
|
jet fuel economy
175 sport jet vs 4.3 v-6 thanks for the responces
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 06:52 PM
|
#2
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 4,286
|
Re: jet fuel economy
I've owned neither but I'd really have to guess the 4.3 would be more efficient.
__________________
Team cheesy cartopper
If I knock my own salmon off with the net in the middle of the ocean and nobody saw it, did it actually happen?
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 07:09 PM
|
#3
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 10,105
|
Re: jet fuel economy
The inboard must be more economical.
__________________
Jack
Please join CCA. It took 140 years to make this mess. Together we will turn it around. Please join us.
Tillamook Anglers!!! Good people doing great things!
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 09:13 PM
|
#4
|
|
Ifish Nate
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Polk Co.
Posts: 2,082
|
Re: jet fuel economy
2 of those words don't even belong around each other, Jet&Economy.
The 4.3 should use less fuel though.
MM
__________________
Team Corn Juice
Flossmaster 5000
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 12:30 AM
|
#5
|
|
Ifish Nate
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bonneville dam
Posts: 2,758
|
Re: jet fuel economy
The 4.3 will eat less fuel, but the sj will eat less room. The cost of a sj is roughly 1000-2000 less depending on pump choice on the 4.3, which will buy a lot of fuel. I don't know about you, but I put a lot more time on my kicker then I do my big motor.
__________________
 If it isn't fickle then it isn't a pickle!!! Member of the 12' boat club! Small Boat Huge Fish or SBHF
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 04:56 AM
|
#6
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: May 2000
Location: West Valley
Posts: 6,161
|
Re: jet fuel economy
I have a 175SJ in an 18 footer with windshield and rag top. At cruise (25mph) it burns 4 gal/hr +/- .5 gal/hr on the Columbia. On the upper Willamette running in a stronger current and going 30mph I burn 6 gal/hr. These numbers are hand calc'ed and based on 3 years and 100 hours of operation.
__________________
The truth is...
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 05:12 AM
|
#7
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tigard, Oregon
Posts: 5,156
|
Re: jet fuel economy
I think they both run on gasoline - not jet fuel. :grin:
UG
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 05:37 AM
|
#8
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 3,583
|
Re: jet fuel economy
LOL... Uglygreen
Jet~~~
__________________
 Jet~~~
I-Fish member #389
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 05:45 AM
|
#9
|
|
Steelhead
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The dry side
Posts: 212
|
Re: jet fuel economy
I have a 4.3 in an 18 ft boat and have guessed about 8 gph fuel consumption in heavy current. On www.willieboats.com in the sportjet section there is a fuel consumption chart. 3000rpm-5.0 gph 4000rpm-7.0 gph 5000rpm-15.0 gph. I know that when I fished Hells Canyon last month for 3 days and my buddy who has a 22ft with a 460 thought my fuel gauge was broke because it hardly moved. One reason I went with the 4.3 is that if I blow it up I can buy a rebuilt long block for $1000.00 and put it in myself. To replace the power head on the 175 is very expensive. Like mikeymoto said,any way you look at it, "boat" and "economical" are not related
__________________
To say you don't have time for something is not a fact, it is a value.
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 07:19 AM
|
#10
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Out in the back forty
Posts: 6,167
|
Re: jet fuel economy
I get 6-7 gph cruising at 4000-4200 rpm, which is about 30 mph. Max the throttle to 5200 rpm, and it rises quickly to 13-14 gph at 42-44 mph. :shocked: 19 ft NR Sportster.
Hardly economical compared to my old 40 hp suzuki, but it doesn't break the bank, either.
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 07:25 AM
|
#11
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: May 2000
Location: West Valley
Posts: 6,161
|
Re: jet fuel economy
SH - I cruise at the same RPM's and my speed is 25mph (gps), but I burn less fuel.
__________________
The truth is...
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|