Go Back   www.ifish.net > Ifish Fishing and Hunting > Life in General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-16-2004, 08:39 AM   #1
lost_sailor
Sturgeon
 
lost_sailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Willamette
Posts: 4,170
Default tangent from Measure 30

** OK, this is a political topic, let's try to be civil and positive so Jennie can be happy happy **

It seems like the system (representative democracy) is not working when we have to repeatedly undo the actions of the state Legislature. (Does this happen in WA as much as OR?) How can we make it better? It seems like we don't trust the people we elect, and it often seems that they don't listen to us.

I know I think my state Rep is an evil dirtball, and I won't even waste my time and his to bother to communicate with him. I did vote for my state Senator, however ... he's a smart guy but I don't feel like he's among the movers and shakers - just not obnoxious enough, I suppose.

Quote:
Originally posted by ORoutdoorsman:
What needs to be done is we need to get new people in office and make it known we are tired of having money taken out of our pockets!
<font size="2" face="verdana,arial,helvetica">We get new people every 2 years, and from my limited observations, the last session was VERY AWARE that people did not want to pay more. Hundreds of us showed up one day to beg for higher license fees, yet they kind of blew us off ... no, can't raise ANY fees or taxes. (The fees did get increased eventually).

They struggled for endless weeks to avoid raising taxes, but ultimately had to strike a balance between providing services and the whole anti-tax trend. They agreed on a balanced budget.

Right off the bat, the tax revolt kicks in and trashes the work of our elected representatives.

How can we reach a point where we trust them to do what we elect them to do? I've challenged some bright and insightful ifish people to run for office and help us out, but no takers. Most of us can't afford to work for a legislator's salary.

Your constructive thoughts will follow ...

[ 01-16-2004, 09:41 AM: Message edited by: lost_sailor ]
__________________
~~~~~ lost_sailor ~~~~~
~~~~~ Team Kiekhaefer ~~~~~
lost_sailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2004, 09:37 AM   #2
Okie
Tuna!
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cedar Mill, Oregon
Posts: 1,447
Default Re: tangent from Measure 30

The problem is politicans don't always do what they say when they are runing for election. Our governor was against more taxes when he was runing for office, now he is for taxes. He double crossed voters.

Schools have more money but they have a spending problem. They have enough for a good education for the kids if they would just use what they have correctly. Private educators do a better job with a lot less money.

The politicians no that if they keep saying the kids will suffer we'll give them more money. Which is the game they are playing. The truth is our kids will not suffer and they will get a good education is spite of the politicians.
Okie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2004, 03:56 PM   #3
ORoutdoorsman
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 163
Default Re: tangent from Measure 30

L.S. WHile I have a feeling our two political views do not coincide, I will give you a run down as to some general reasons I think the money is wasted, and what needs to be done about it. One of the biggest wastes of money, is the fact that people come from out of country, and recieve benefits that you and I pay for. Period. Someone has the ability to come here illegally, have a child, and then live here because the child is a citizen. They don't have to work, they get welfare, as well as free heathcare and money for the child.The more kids, the more money. This is all paid for by you and I. And eliminating what this costs would solve the school problem. But there are too many bleeding hearts out there that say we cannot just allow these people to starve. Well, what they do is their choice. They have the ability to either work, or not. If they come to this country and don't work, they either don't eat or leave. Plain and simple. As far as their kids that are U.S.citizens, I am more than happy to fund foster care for U.S. citizens if their parents are not willing to take care of them. This also goes for low life citizens that use kids as a meal ticket. They recieve housing and welfare to get back on their feet. If they are not making an attempt to get back on their feet, they lose welfare, and their kids. And this may sound harsh, but kids have a better chance being taken away from people like this, rather than growing up with people that live this way. Because with people like this, the money they receive for their kids, does not go to the kids. Another program that needs to be done away with is free education to people that are not U.S. citizens. And im not talking only about people that come here illegally, people come here legally and can receive a state funded education. Why? Why will we cut our funding for the school of American children, to fund the education of someone who is not an American? And believe me, there are people who are not from this country that come here to recieve a free education,and leave. There are also people who come here and work, to send their money out of country and then leave. And no one can tell me this is made up, because I currently know someone who is living here, working, sending his money to Mexico to start a business there, and is receiving a free education, and free health care on our dollar.We are paying for him to further his education, so he can start a business somewhere else, which is absolutely no benefit to you and I. So, if we stopped catering to people who are not U.S. citizens, and start focusing on our country, our citizens, and citizens who do not exploit the system, we would have solved all of our budget problems right there. But the bleeding hearts say oh we have to give them free healthcare, and free education. Well, no we dont. If someone refuses to get a job, or refuses to try and better their life, then made the decision to starve. I say if anyone wants to come to America and make a better life for themselves by working hard, and actually making a life for themselves, then they are more than welcome to do so. But if someone comes here, and lives off of our tax dollars, send them home. Or atleast don't give them our hard earned money. I also say that if a citizen decides they want to live off the system rather then working, then they will be cut off. Welfare is to help someone get back on their feet so they can once again be a contributing member to society, and to the economy, not so they dont have to work or contribute. I am all for welfare, however it needs to be heavily regulated, and restricted. And by doing this welfare would get better because we would be able to offer more money to the people that need it, rather then spending all this money on people who abuse the system.If we stopped paying for people who use the system and never contribute anything, we would have money for seniors, we would have money for disabled people. If we stopped allowing people to abuse us, and our system, then we would be able to have health care, and assistance in place that works, for people who actualy need and deserve it. Rather than a system that does not work and primarily caters to those that abuse it. The next issue that is on the top of my list is the waste of money going on inside the schools themselves. If teachers are so highly trained that they need more money, then we need to make sure we are hiring people qualified to educate our kids, and trained well enough to identify people who are not well enough educated. Teachers, and state testing should be more than enough to ensure that kids are properly educated. But no, we decide that on top of state testing, we need CIM. For those of you that don't know what CIM is, it means certificate of initial mastery. This is a program that was discarded by another state because it did not work(I dont recall which one) and was picked up by Oregon. And to illustrate how much of a drain this is on our money, I will inform you just how money is spent on CIM. First off, with the advent of CIM, every school has to hire someone to be responsible for CIM. That means, every individual school must pay the salary, and benefits of another person to run CIM testing. The state has to pay people to write the tests for CIM, and must pay people to grade the tests for CIM. CIM requires that billions of pieces of paper must be purchased, tests printed, and used for this testing. So, this program alone wastes millions of dollars a year that should be going to schools. Not to mention, that time is taken away from teachers teaching class, to prepare and test for CIM. Well, we have state testing, and we have grades for a reason. If these teachers are so qualified, and so highly trained that they deserve all this money, and all these benefits, then they should be qualified enough to grade on a level that would determin if a student is fit to pass or not. Period. The reform of welfare, and the elimination of CIM alone would more then solve our budget problems. And these are just two major, money wasting problems that the state of Oregon has. There are numerous other ventures that we throw our money away at. And I refuse to support paying more money. The problem is a direct result of programs that need to be either change, or eliminated. I understand we need better funding for schools. And I definately know we need better funding for state services, such as police and fire. And the fact is, if we eliminated the waste, and did a better job at running this state, we would have more than enough money to run the schools well, run the jails well, run state assistance well, and not have to tax citizens to death. That is why I will not support a tax increase until we have addressed and solved the issue of wasted money and lame programs that are a drain on the budget. If we did this, we would have a welfare system that worked, and over funded school system, and we would be able to offer assistence and security to those of us that need it and deserve it. If my view offends anyone, I am sorry. I am simply stating the fact, and my view on the way this state is run. If you disagree then fine. I respect the fact that everyone has their own opinion.
Now, since my taxes, license, tag, and federal duck stamp have all been paid for. I am going to enjoy the money that has been wisely spend on the ODFW, and spend this weekend shooting ducks.

[ 01-16-2004, 05:01 PM: Message edited by: ORoutdoorsman ]
ORoutdoorsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2004, 04:30 PM   #4
husker
Ifish Nate
 
husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: hillsboro
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: tangent from Measure 30

oh man....i hate paying my money to the government....that being said.....our population is getting older and they dont want to part with there money much....and probably in a few years ill feel the same....however.....schools need support....some programs are good and some are bad.....thats and opinion which i cannot deny....the children of today are tomorrows future....when you the older folks on ifish think about your scholling what did u pay for?....thats right nothing.....so support the children of today for a better tomorrow ...its in your and there best interest.....
__________________
husker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2004, 06:12 PM   #5
Norski
Sturgeon
 
Norski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend Oregon
Posts: 3,854
Default Re: tangent from Measure 30

Now we went and asked to raise fee's on our sport that we love.

Where is the extra going?? has anyone heard of any hatcherys being helped???

Have you seen any cops catching snaggers??

Where has the money gone to???
__________________
Your never lost, if you don't care where you are.
Norski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2004, 05:32 AM   #6
24 on/ 48 off
King Salmon
 
24 on/ 48 off's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Narrows, Wilson River.
Posts: 6,151
Default Re: tangent from Measure 30

I believe they raised the fees to maintain current levels of service. Otherwise, it would had resulted in decreased services.

--spud-- :smile:
__________________
My boat runs on GA$- Not "Thanks"
24 on/ 48 off is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2004, 09:14 AM   #7
lost_sailor
Sturgeon
 
lost_sailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Willamette
Posts: 4,170
Default Re: tangent from Measure 30

Yeah, yeah ... let's not get distracted - the topic here is how to get the people and the legislators on the same page.

(Yes the fee increases were to avoid cutbacks, and more than hatcheries - and it's probably way too soon to judge if it was a good deal)

(ORoutdoorsman, you might be shocked at how much I agree with you. I am indeed a tie-dyed treehugger, but my heart doesn't bleed enough to want to support people who can't take care of themselves - - well, not by way of the government; through churches and charities I try to do what I can.)

Did you vote for your state rep/senator? Or did the "other guy" win? Do you call them, send letters, email?

I do, but I should do more.
__________________
~~~~~ lost_sailor ~~~~~
~~~~~ Team Kiekhaefer ~~~~~
lost_sailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Cast to



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:48 AM.

Terms of Service
Page generated in 0.08901 seconds with 10 queries