Go Back   www.ifish.net > Ifish Fishing and Hunting > Life in General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2003, 01:17 AM   #1
Born to be Wild
Sturgeon
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Longview Washington
Posts: 3,904
Default France and Britain Agree -- in Part !

The only reason I posted this Fox article is because of the paragraph I highlighted in bold below. Something I have to keep in mind along with some of the other ifisher's.

France and Britain Agree -- in Part -- on Iraq

Wednesday, April 09, 2003


PARIS — The British and French foreign ministers, meeting as Baghdad came under allied control, agreed Wednesday that coalition troops are needed to secure Iraq, but France also repeated demands for a "central" United Nations role in rebuilding the country.

British Foreign Minister Jack Straw said the United States and Britain want Iraq to have a "representative, democratic" government quickly, but cautioned: "That can't happen overnight."

"In those circumstances, since United States (and) United Kingdom forces are the reality on the ground, in terms of providing security and stabilitn Minister Dominique de Villepin concurred.

"It's a difficult, delicate period and clearly ... forces on the ground have the primary responsibility in this phase," he said.

But for Iraq's reconstruction, "it is important that the legitimacy of the international community be upheld, and for this the United Nations needs a central place," the French minister said.

The European leaders met as U.S. military officials said President Saddam Hussein's government no longer controlled Baghdad and most parts of Iraq. But the Americans warned more fighting was ahead.

France led European opposition to the war, infuriating British officials, and is now pushing for the United Nations to have a major role in building the peace.

But Britain and the United States, while speaking of a "vital" role for the world body, have stopped short of saying the United Nations will have a broad mandate.

Asked for the difference between a "central" and a "vital" U.N. role, Straw said: "I think it's more or less the same."

"We are, I think, in agreement that the United Nations has its full place in this process," said de Villepin.

Neither minister, who spoke to reporters after a breakfast meeting in Paris, gave details of how the United Nations might be involved.

But in a statement published Wednesday in Le Figaro newspaper, Straw said Britain wants the United Nations to supervise international aid to Iraq.

He also expressed hope it will "play a major role" in organizing a postwar conference of Iraqi representatives, and said Britain would seek U.N. Security Council endorsement for "an appropriate post-conflict administration" in Iraq.

The meeting between Straw and de Villepin followed a period of intense strain and even open hostility in French-British relations caused by disputes over the Iraq conflict, European Union policies and other issues.

But the two ministers sought to give the impression that their nations' ties remain solid.

"Life would be very boring if friends always agreed," said Straw. "This is a grown-up relationship."

"What unites us is stronger than what divides us," said de Villepin.

In Berlin, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, who has been staunchly anti-war, said he was encouraged by coalition successes in Iraq, but he emphasized the need for a central U.N. role in rebuilding the country.

"The important thing now is to make a political profit out of a probable and welcome victory," Schroeder said. "That will only be the case if the Iraqi people can decide themselves on political and economic conditions. That must, of course, be the aim of everyone."
Born to be Wild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2003, 10:31 AM   #2
Snapset
Ifish Nate
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Philomath
Posts: 2,456
Default Re: France and Britain Agree -- in Part !

DBD, I agree with the literal meaning of the highlighted sentence. When applied symbolically to the debate of killing thousands in a war vs. allowing thousands to suffer and die by not going to war, it rings a little shallow.

The french are still on my personal list. (Not the "A" one). I guess the British are more forgiving.

[ 04-10-2003, 11:58 AM: Message edited by: Snapset ]
__________________
Snapset is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2003, 10:47 AM   #3
Cool Texan
King Salmon
 
Cool Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Suburbia
Posts: 6,735
Default Re: France and Britain Agree -- in Part !

DDD, I agree with you and the article.
__________________
Team Real Men Eat Cheerios
Cool Texan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2003, 11:39 PM   #4
CATCH AND EAT
King Salmon
 
CATCH AND EAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 21,813
Default Re: France and Britain Agree -- in Part !

Now that the dirty work is done we can all play nice together in the neighborhood. Sounds like those that were invited but did not play are now claiming the ball is theirs.

Wonder just who's political gains Schroder was talking about.
__________________
SHUT UP AND FISH!


Be pompous, obese, and eat cactus
Be dull, and boring, and omnipresent
Criticize things you don't know about
Be oblong and have your knees removed
CATCH AND EAT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Cast to



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 AM.

Terms of Service
Page generated in 0.06169 seconds with 10 queries