 |
09-05-2008, 09:36 AM
|
#1
|
|
Steelhead
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: springfield,or
Posts: 150
|
your thoughts on expandable broadheads
should odfw change the law or leave it the same
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 09:45 AM
|
#2
|
|
Chromer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lebanon,oregon
Posts: 838
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
YES!!change the law
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 09:49 AM
|
#3
|
|
Ifish Nate
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Dalles Ore
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
I have use expandables were they are legal.Some are Junk and some are as good as it gets.Rocket steelheads are a very good head and the are as deadly as muzzys or similar heads .There are a lot of people that have used the junk and made up there minds on all expanables.I shot a big hog with a rocket steelhead at 45 yards and it blow thru him like he was made of paper.I shot a small bull at 32 yards with the rocket and with the same results as the hog.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 10:00 AM
|
#4
|
|
Chromer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 959
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Did you guys see the Dick's ad from last week? Expandable broadheads on sale. I wonder if those guys know the regulations in Oregon...
Rip'N'Lips
__________________
Remember 97% of all statistics are made up...
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 10:19 AM
|
#5
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Mid-Willamette Valley
Posts: 4,421
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Leave the regulation as is.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 10:32 AM
|
#6
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Goble,OR
Posts: 1,980
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hookset
Leave the regulation as is.
|

__________________
Save a salmonid, shoot a sawbill.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 10:59 AM
|
#8
|
|
Ifish Nate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Troutdale
Posts: 2,898
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
I'm not a bowhunter so please forgive me....
What is the advantage or disatvantge of mechanical broadheads? why are some agianst them and others for them?
__________________
Time marches on, time marches on......
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 11:06 AM
|
#9
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: northbend oregon
Posts: 1,207
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
I have had success with them in the past. For me, they fly better than a fixed blade broadhead and open to a larger cutting diameter.
For all of the Haters: Why are you opposed to a device that can increase accuracy and thus result in more humane kills?
Don't give me the " they are weak" broadheads line. There are some pretty crappy broadheads with fixed blades as well.
__________________
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 11:47 AM
|
#10
|
|
Chromer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Springfield
Posts: 927
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
change it
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 11:50 AM
|
#11
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canby
Posts: 6,127
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Quote:
Originally Posted by outdoor.spec.ops
I have had success with them in the past. For me, they fly better than a fixed blade broadhead and open to a larger cutting diameter.
For all of the Haters: Why are you opposed to a device that can increase accuracy and thus result in more humane kills?
Don't give me the " they are weak" broadheads line. There are some pretty crappy broadheads with fixed blades as well.
|
Tune your bow better and fixed blade broadheads will fly just well as field points. we don't need expandables in Oregon
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 11:59 AM
|
#12
|
|
Ifish Nate
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Trapped in the city
Posts: 2,391
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Quote:
|
Tune your bow better and fixed blade broadheads will fly just well as field points. we don't need expandables in Oregon
|
Every bow should be tuned as good as possible, regardless of broadhead used. I'm still waiting to hear a good explanation though on why mechanicals shouldn't be legal.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 12:03 PM
|
#13
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canby
Posts: 6,127
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackdog
Every bow should be tuned as good as possible, regardless of broadhead used. I'm still waiting to hear a good explanation though on why mechanicals shouldn't be legal.

|
Call ODFW and ask them why they outlawed them. my guess is that the older models didnt' always open on contact. My guess is until they can make them bullet proof they will remain illegal.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 12:05 PM
|
#14
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: northbend oregon
Posts: 1,207
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagleclaw
Tune your bow better and fixed blade broadheads will fly just well as field points. we don't need expandables in Oregon
|
Thats not a strong statement.........Perhaps our ancestors should have cleaned their french drains...we don't need sewers in the world our crap ditches work just fine!
FYI my bow is tuned and my fixed blades work great. I just would like the option.
__________________
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 12:55 PM
|
#15
|
|
Ifish Nate
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hillsboro
Posts: 3,059
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
I was against them when they first came out because the WERE garbage. I am not totally against them now....however...there should be a maximum expanded size--too big and people who try that "rake 'em down the side" shot are going to get lousy penetration and leave wounded animals in the field. I did the test...so I dont need to hear it. Too much of a quartering shot is not going to be a good result. It often times isnt with fixed blades either. Part of me does not like the fact that you can just screw one on and go hunting and get good accuracy...there is no learning curb to understand why your bow reacts a certain way...no tinkering to get familiar with your weapon. It may happen in the future... I would accept it with certain limitations but personally......I am going to stick with fixed heads
Todd
__________________
You dont get if you dont ask!!
TV Chapter NW Steelheaders/CCA
Team Brown Dawg!!
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 03:23 PM
|
#16
|
|
Coho
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 54
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
leave it like it is
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 03:52 PM
|
#17
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 7,787
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Another reason is that a sharp broad that comes out after a bad hit can be healed up a mechanical blade is more than likely to stay in the animal and cause a infection. I see no reason to make a change get a slower bow if yours can't be tuned
__________________
Team Purist If there is any proof of a man in a hunt it is not whether he killed a deer or elk but how he hunted it.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 04:27 PM
|
#18
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pendleton/ Round up city
Posts: 1,659
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Change it!
I wonna shoot Rage expandables!!!!!!
__________________
"Courage is being scared to death but saddling up anyway" J.W.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 06:27 PM
|
#19
|
|
Cutthroat
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 23
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rip'N'Lips
Did you guys see the Dick's ad from last week? Expandable broadheads on sale. I wonder if those guys know the regulations in Oregon...
Rip'N'Lips
|
Yes, we know the regs on Oregon and you cannot buy them at the store. I am pretty sure the ad was submitted by someone outside of Oregon. I could be wrong though.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 07:45 PM
|
#20
|
|
Coho
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Klamath Falls
Posts: 75
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Actually the regulations state that mechanical broadheads are illegal to posses in the field while hunting big game, therefore the the stores can legally sell them. Some may say the shops are "promoting" the use of mechanicals by stocking them, but the stores won't stop selling firearms because it is bow season.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 08:11 PM
|
#21
|
|
Steelhead
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albany, Oregon
Posts: 325
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Leave the regs.....
Expandables are not all they are cracked up to be and would also most likely tempt others to shoot beyond exceptable and ethic limits.........
Energy and time used opening the expandables is cut on contact time lost which equals less efficient killing.
No I have not used them myself but my old hunting partner (who is a good archer) lost two magnificent bulls in one season in Wyoming. I think he actually quit bowhunting because of it. Any angled shot is out of the question.......
We don't use the poison capsule broadheads here either but many people wanted to use them way back when also.
my two cents.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 08:32 PM
|
#22
|
|
Chromer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Clackamas
Posts: 609
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
I know it doesn't happen all the time but I put a muzzy through an elk rib last year and it still punched through both lungs. I knew it was a good shot but it sounded like I hit a shoulder blade. He died before I could even put another arrow into him. I have a friend that guides for elk in states that allow expandables and he says I wouldn't have got that elk with an expandable. I don't know but I am happy using fixed blades.
I don't see any problem using them for deer. I agree there are some crappy fixed blades out there but I guess you have to draw the line somewhere.
__________________
I don't think about fishing ALL the time...........I think about hunting too.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 08:41 PM
|
#23
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lebanon, Oregon
Posts: 1,175
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
I am not sure of this but there is a video some where that showed a man shooting a bull with a mechanical BH. The shot was angled and one blade deployed fully and the other did not. I think that might just be enough to stop you from getting very good penetration. I think also that the regs are fine the way they are.
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 12:42 AM
|
#24
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Mid-Willamette Valley
Posts: 4,421
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Quote:
Originally Posted by outdoor.spec.ops
For me, they fly better than a fixed blade broadhead and open to a larger cutting diameter.
|
IMO - That larger cutting diameter doesn't necessarily equal a more effective kill. It also means these blades or more prone to deflection resulting in less penetration when hitting bone, and on game the size of elk that's not a good thing. Plus those extra long blades don't have enough back bone and strength for large game either. But the real kicker to me is the expandable broadheads are not broadheads at all until they open and having to rely on a mechanical release and hinge at the point of impact seriously challenges the effectiveness on large game like elk.
I also believe there are other reason; morally, and traditionally why expandables heads are not legal in Oregon.
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 01:12 AM
|
#25
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 1,332
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
I think it is all good. To me it comes down to knowing your equipment and having confidence in it.
I also think they should alow 80% let off on your bows. . That might help in cutting back on loosing wounded animals because your arms are shaking from holding your bow too long because you are not willing to pass on the shot, might not get another chance the rest of the season.
__________________
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 06:10 AM
|
#26
|
|
Ifish Nate
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bend Oregon
Posts: 2,088
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hooked up
I also think they should alow 80% let off on your bows. .
|
your wish has been granted
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 06:43 AM
|
#27
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canby
Posts: 6,127
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
[quote=Hooked up;2162270] .
I also think they should alow 80% let off on your bows. .
ODFW changed that rule. 80% left off is legal in Oregon
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 07:23 AM
|
#28
|
|
Steelhead
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kelso Washington
Posts: 443
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
They made that rule in Oregon, Washington and Idaho on the first generation mechanicals that would fail (Pucketts blood trailer) That was 15-18 years ago. I don't know much about them since they aren't legal so I haven't messed around with them, but if they don't fail anymore I say make them legal. Better flight, larger wound channel sounds like a more effective head. Has anyone seen any tests done on mechanical heads in recent years?
__________________
"Deer season is just a scouting trip for my next elk hunt!"
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 11:28 AM
|
#29
|
|
Coho
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 100
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
There seems to be very few other states that outlaw Mechs. I don't believe that there is a good point to be made by outlawing them. They have come a long way in quality since we all first saw them all those years ago. I use the fixed blade G5 but I'd change in a heartbeat if mechs were legal.
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 03:26 PM
|
#30
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Forest Grove, OR
Posts: 9,069
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
This could be debated all day. The reason behind me wanting them to keep the regs the way they are is simple logic. With mechanical, you're hoping the blades open and cut on contact with the animal. With fixed blades, your blades are cutting from the moment of out of taking them out of your quiver. I don't want to chance my shot on an animal that they might or might not open.
That being said, I haven't had much experience with the mechanicals, however, I'm sure they've come along way since they first came out.
-jokester
__________________
TEAM POP TART 
Fishing is always good...catching is just a bonus
Romans 8:28
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 07:14 PM
|
#31
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: northbend oregon
Posts: 1,207
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobberman
your wish has been granted
|
Tune your arm up and you won't need 80% letoff
__________________
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 07:37 PM
|
#32
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eastside
Posts: 1,997
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagleclaw
Tune your bow better and fixed blade broadheads will fly just well as field points. we don't need expandables in Oregon
|
Exactly, most people are too lazy.....better for the guys' whos passion is bowhunting 
Plus there arent any expandables that will match up to the strength of something like an MX4, Slick Trick, G5 Striker...
__________________
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 07:50 PM
|
#33
|
|
Steelhead
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albany, Oregon
Posts: 325
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
Isn't gear already advanced enough? What happened to actual hunting skills.......this is bowhunting we are talking about, lets keep it real.
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 08:10 PM
|
#34
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St Helens, OR
Posts: 1,049
|
Re: your thoughts on expandable broadheads
The OLD expandables lose too much kinetic energy when they hit a quartered target when only one blade opens & the other does not, resulting in poor penetration & poor cutting. The new (rage) cam type open all the way on impact & angles don't matter. They leave a large wound channel causing massive Hemorrhaging.
These I think should be legal. I don't condone long range bow shots & would not take one just because I was shooting an expandable.
__________________
John 3:16
 Join CCA
"If I enjoy wasting my time is it really time wasted?"
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|