OCEAN Saltwater Sportsmen's Show 2012

Go Back   www.ifish.net > Ifish Fishing and Hunting > The Salty Dogs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-23-2002, 09:24 PM   #1
Sensei-san
Chromer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 663
Default Oh Brother.....

PACIFIC FISHERIES
Overfishing could bring tougher rules
Feds may close Pacific shelf
Alameda County Newspapers - 5/23/02
By Douglas Fischer, staff writer

Federal fish managers are preparing brutal new restrictions -- possibly shutting down the entire continental shelf from Mexico to
Canada to fishing next year -- as they realize efforts to prevent overfishing off the coast of the Pacific Ocean have failed.

The unprecedented cutbacks, to be implemented in September and effective in 2003, are certain to affect virtually every fishery off
the coast -- from salmon to halibut to shrimp to even the Dover sole locals like to hook for dinner, federal managers say.

At worst -- a scenario that many on Wednesday said was quite likely -- the new rules could force recreational and commercial
fishers off the water completely, stopping cold an industry that pumps more than $5.5 billion into California's economy.

"We basically could be telling a million people or more that they can't go fishing in the ocean," said Ralph Brown, an Oregon trawl
fisher and a member of the Pacific Fisheries Management Council, the federal panel overseeing ocean fishing. "It's that serious."

The magnitude of the decision had anglers, commercial fishers, environmentalists, state and federal biologists grasping for words
Wednesday. New harvest levels -- and the Draconian measures necessary to meet them -- were first unveiled Tuesday during a
Pacific Fisheries Council subcommittee teleconference.

"If they shut down the shelf, boy, the commercial folks -- it's hard to imagine they could be in deeper trouble," said John DeVore, the
council's ground-fish management coordinator. "The levels allowable under even the most optimistic conditions might not even be
enough to accommodate the by-catch" of the various fisheries on the continental shelf.

Even worse is the rebuilding period necessary to restore the fishery's health: 156 years for one species, yellow-eye rockfish,
assuming all fishing stops next year, according to federal estimates. Boccacio, another hard-hit species, needs 90 years.

The continental shelf gradually slopes from the coast to a depth of about 600 feet, before dropping preciptiously to what is called the
continental slope. The bulk of California's commercial and recreational fisheries -- including salmon, halibut, sole, squid, shrimp --
come from the Pacific shelf.

"This is scary stuff," said Pete Leipzig, executive director of the Fisherman's Marketing Association, which represents commercial
harvesters in California, Oregon and Washington. "People like myself are struggling with how to get creative -- how we can structure
some kind of fishing off the shelf, on the continental slope, to sustain some fishing."

The concern centers on three types of rockfish, a long-lived, slow-growing fin fish once common in offshore reefs and sold as pacific
red snapper: boccacio, yellow-eye and canary.

Overfishing has dropped populations so precipitously that fish wardens fret that even accidental by-catch -- fish inadvertently caught
while trolling or fishing for other species such as shrimp and halibut -- will push the rockfish into extinction.

This year boccacio, for instance, has an "allowable by-catch" of 100 tons for the entire West Coast. That will shrink to between zero
and 14 tons next year, DeVore said. Yellow-eye is even worse, with Oregon, Washington and California splitting no more than 1,200
pounds, or about 300 fish, next year.

For perspective, the International Pacific Halibut Commission conducts an annual survey to assess the health of its stocks. That
survey alone, Brown said, will accidentally hook all 300 of those fish, effectively closing every other fishery as no more accidental
catches would be allowed.

"If scientists decide to stop doing surveys, we shut down the fisheries," he said. "Because we don't have the information."

Problems won't stop there, either, other experts warned. Fishing restrictions on the continental shelf will send both commercial and
recreational boats into the deeper waters of the continental slope or the shallow, state-controlled near-shore waters.

The latter is already under considerable distress, with more than 150 recreational anglers protesting at a state hearing Tuesday
night that current harvest limits, particularly for commercial boats, are unsustainable.

Deputy Director Dirk Brazil of the California Department of Fish and Game cautioned that the federal discussions are still too
preliminary to start predicting outcomes. "This obviously complicates things. There's no way to sugarcoat that," he said. "But how
it's going to manifest itself -- there's no way to say right now."

But privately, others within the department called the situation "extreme," one that could force dramatic change to near-shore
regulations that have been nearly three years in the making.

Marine sport fishing, according to department estimates, kicks $5 billion into California's coastal communities and employs 150,000
people. The state's commercial harvest -- the fifth largest in the nation -- is worth about $550 million with the industry keeping 17,000
employed.

"People are going to play the blame game big time on this one," said DeVore. "It got to the point where the game was over 10 years
ago, but we just realized it today."

Federal law requires the council to act to protect the species if the data stand up over the summer. Congress or the courts could
step in, but there's an example of what happens if politics trumps science, said Mark Powell, acting director of fish conservation for
the nonprofit Ocean Conservancy.

In the 1980s scientists predicted the Grand Bank of Canada's Newfoundland coast was being gravely overfished. Regulators fudged
and delayed, but by 1992 the decision was made for them: Cod populations crashed, and 30,000 people were thrown out of work,
the largest mass layoff ever in Canada.

DeVore said the situation in the Pacific is worse. Cod at least is starting to come back 10 years later. Rockfish will need a century.

"You have a complete cessation of the fishery here, and no one alive today is going to see it come back," he said. "This is one of
the most extreme management challenges I'm aware of in fisheries management."#
Sensei-san is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 07:14 AM   #2
Pilar
Mr. Carkington
 
Pilar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Not all that wander are lost.
Posts: 10,882
Default Re: Oh Brother.....

Two questions ... Who is the guy who wrote this and who signs his paycheck?

100 years to recover Boccachio stocks to what level?

What do you think?
__________________
"Never mistake motion for action"
Ernest Hemingway
"thud!"
Pilar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 08:53 AM   #3
Sensei-san
Chromer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 663
Default Re: Oh Brother.....

Pilar, I had hoped that someone would have noticed the posting. I guess we are all brain dead from PFD's and the boating accident to see the train coming down the tunnel. The article was in yesterdays Oakland Tribune. www.oakland tribune.com. It was in response to the recent rockfish meeting that occurred in Oakland and the PFMC teleconference on rockfish.

Yes, according to the marine biologist that I know, it will take a century to rebuild the boccacio stocks. Probably more now that all the prime habitat has been laser-leveled by the roller drag gear. A reef rockfish like a china cod or quillback cod that inhabits only one rock also takes twenty years to grow to maturity. If you extend the biological timelines to people timelines which would be similar, if you had only a pair of china rockfish on a reef, you can easily figure out how long it would take to have a family of fish from two fish. Way different than with salmon that have a life cycle of three to four years.
Sensei-san is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 10:55 AM   #4
Pilar
Mr. Carkington
 
Pilar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Not all that wander are lost.
Posts: 10,882
Default Re: Oh Brother.....

What I am getting out of this is that the commercial strip mine fishermen are facing the closure of their destructive fishery, (roller drag nets) and insist that all fishers share their pain.

In other words, the only way to get rid of those guys is to close it outright.
__________________
"Never mistake motion for action"
Ernest Hemingway
"thud!"
Pilar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 12:38 PM   #5
Threemuch
King Salmon
 
Threemuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,275
Default Re: Oh Brother.....

Roller drag boats are evil, but no match for the live fish shallow water commercials. They clear out all the bottom fish from 150' on in. And they are headed our way as they get run out of town in washington and CA.

KB
Threemuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 05:07 PM   #6
Sensei-san
Chromer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 663
Default Re: Oh Brother.....

THREEMUCH, Besides Pilar and blackmagic, I am afraid that we are preaching to the choir. Like the old Jackson Browne song about being older and wiser now, those of us that have lived through the "live rockfish" commercial explotiation know how appealing it is to small time commercial fishermen. I always thought that the image of the guy setting his stick gear in a state park with a kayak would be enough to get them shut down but nobody seemed to care.

I just hope it's not to late to care.....
Sensei-san is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 05:22 PM   #7
Keta
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Oh Brother.....

Sounds like another case of sportfishermen taking it in the shorts due to commercial overharvest!

Yellow eye, short raker, and silver gray rockfish (boccachio) do take a long time to mature but they release clouds of babies that travel with the currents as zooplankton (sp?) and only settle on the reefs after they mature.

Who has been in charge of fisheries (mis)management for the last 10 years? :whazzup:
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2002, 04:48 AM   #8
Fishplay
Ifish Nate
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Grand Ronde,OR.USA
Posts: 2,773
Default Re: Oh Brother.....

This is devastating news. With all the inland restrictions on salmonoids and sturgeon I have been very seriously shopping for a boat better suited to Big Blue. Now I'll Have to reconsider that idea. I really perfer to fish the ocean for salmon.....no crowds ya know.....and as far as eating^^ if it isn't whitefish I can't get excited.
Eventually we'll be left with nothing but stories of fishing!!! :shocked:
__________________
Pacific Pork.....The Other White Meat!

Member #472

Trophy 2059 Hardtop (BrineTime)
Fishplay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2002, 10:09 PM   #9
Sensei-san
Chromer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 663
Default Re: Oh Brother.....

The bad news continues. One of the unintended or intended consequences of a total rockfish closure is that they could close down ancilliary fisheries like halibut. One of the targets is the 1,200 metric ton catch of yellow eye rockfish. One reason why there is a prohibition on yellow eye while halibut fishing was to encourage people to fish where they will not encounter yellow eye. (I still can't figure out how you can predict if yellow eye are down there when you are fishing for halibut.) If they lower yellow eye quotas to zero, then ipso facto halibut fishing is done for.

This is one of the crazy rules that could come about. At least with the salmon restrictions, various runs of salmon were first declared endangered then the hammer fell. With rockfish they are jumping straight to closures without declaring them endangered but overfished. Sometimes you get what you ask for. A lot of well intended people felt that putting in overfished in the Magnason Act would make the councils more cautious in setting fishing quotas not the draconian measures that are being proposed.
Sensei-san is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Cast to



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:46 PM.

Terms of Service
Page generated in 0.09863 seconds with 10 queries