 |
04-28-2007, 08:57 AM
|
#1
|
|
Fry
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 19
|
Outboard vs Sportsjet
Hi,
I'm new to this forum and have read a lot of great posts. I still have a little problem (big for me) that I can't decide wich way to go. I've been looking at two boats. Two great manufactures so I'm really deciding on the motor. One is the 175 Sportsjet and the other is the Merc. 150 Optimax pump. I've read so many opinions on both motors I think I'm more confused now than when I started. They are both 2003. I'm mainly wanting to know about reliability. Any thoughts?? I'm driving myself (and the wife)  crazy trying to decide.
I hear horror stories for both. I wish one had a Yamaha but those are hard to find used.
Oh yeh..the Sportsjet in on a 19' and the Optimax is on a 20' both alum. boats.
Thanks,
Steve
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 09:04 AM
|
#2
|
|
Ifish Nate
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Waldport, OR
Posts: 2,616
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Go with the outboard. You gas bill will be the big thing that you notice. Outboards are very easy to work on. Plus you will only want an extra foot or two if you buy the smaller boat.
__________________
Team Willie Boats
Team Yamaha
Captain-TEAM MSR
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 09:19 AM
|
#3
|
|
Chromer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: A town
Posts: 505
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
I had a sportjet and although we had no problems I think the next boat we get will have an outboard . Just for fuel costs alone .And I have heard they are a little quieter.
__________________
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 09:24 AM
|
#4
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Salem / Pacific City
Posts: 1,229
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Fish4me,
The best way to decide is to take a ride in both and go with your gut feeling. I own a 20' Willie Predator with a 200 Optimax sportjet. I like it. But there are drawbacks as with any configuration. I have heard that the 175's can be a bit more finicky and they tend to smoke. I would hope the 175 owners might chime in. Having a "doghouse" in your fishing area can be a pain, but on the other hand it is nice to sit on, and provides a waist high table for various activites. Sportjets tend to be noisy. The good news is a that a 200 sportjet puts out 200hp at the pump. Go for a ride in both and pick the one YOU like. Better yet, buy the one your wife likes!
Orion
__________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big
enough to take away everything you have" Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 10:15 AM
|
#5
|
|
Chromer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 533
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
I had a 200opti S/J in my last MM - found it powerful and reliable, but a bit loud. If I remember correctly, the 175 & 200 are the same powerhead, but the 175 is carbed and typically doesn't have a muffler system. I did find that routine maintenance on the S/J was a pain in the arse if you do it yourself.
A lot of it just depends on the manufacturer, size and layout of the boat...
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 10:58 AM
|
#6
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Salem / Pacific City
Posts: 1,229
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Bluto has an excellent point about maintaining a sportjet. The way that mine is positioned, it is nearly impossible to change the spark plugs without pulling the powerhead. The first time I did it it took me about six hours to change six plugs. The space between the powerhead and the stern is so tight that you can barely get your fingers on the plugs. You certainly can't see them so you have to feel your way around and hope you don't pull any other wires loose in the process. I think I might be able to a plug change down to three hours next time!
Orion
__________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big
enough to take away everything you have" Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 02:58 PM
|
#7
|
|
Fry
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 19
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Thanks, those are good responses.  I will be test driving the boat with the optimax Sunday. Not sure when I will get to test the Sportsjet. I hope I get more responses from more boat owners, it really helps,
Thanks,
Steve
That was funny Orion
Quote:
|
Go for a ride in both and pick the one YOU like. Better yet, buy the one your wife likes!
|
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 03:13 PM
|
#8
|
|
Chromer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tigard, OR
Posts: 534
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
I have an inboard jet and the next boat will have an outboard....simply more room without the doghouse.
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 03:27 PM
|
#9
|
|
Chromer
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Happy Valley
Posts: 887
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
The 175 spotjet and the 200 optimax sportjet do not have the same powerhead. The 175 is much easier to work on than the 200 opti sj. The 175 is smokey at idle, but not too bad on step. It is also loud in a ringing two stroke kind of way. I would be partial to the sj over the 150 opti, but as others have said you need to figure out what fits your needs best and go from there.
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 03:52 PM
|
#10
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toledo Wa
Posts: 4,577
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
The 175 sj in my 98 20ft. Predator has been a very good motor.I've had to replace the stator and thats it.
Its very easy to work on.Plugs are a peice of cake.Lots of room.Pump and everything else is pretty simple too.
They are a bit loud but lots of power and a very reliable engine.
Its all in what you want with your boat.+s and -s with both.
Hntnfsh
__________________
"A man is about as big as the things that make him mad"
(unknown)
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 06:06 PM
|
#11
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 1,561
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Have a 175 Sportjet in 20' Jetcraft(for sale) that works real well. Is smokey when real cold but plenty of poop and dependable. Doesn't seem too bad on fuel to me. Easy to get to motor and small doghouse-about like a medium ice chest on end up against the transom. Have had no problems with it.
Previous boat had 115hp Yamy outboard 2stroke pump and the motor weight was noticably way out back.
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 06:51 PM
|
#12
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 38,757
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Is the outboard on an offshore bracket, in a motor well or on a full height transom? Where will you be using the boat? Ocean, river, bay, lake, pond? Is there a reason you're looking at a jet instead of a prop? Unless you're going to be slipping up skinny rivers, a jet is going to cost you MPGs. I'm on my second 175XJR-SJ. As mentioned above, I did have a stator go out without warning. I think that's largely because the "dog-house" boat makers build to cover the SJ traps moisture at the top of the motor. The Optimax isn't one of Merc's most shining moments either, however. Bottom line, without knowing where or how you plan to use the boat, I'd be less concerned with the motor than the application of the boat.
__________________
Report Game Violations!
Washington: 1 877 933-9847
Oregon: 1 800 452-7888
|
|
|
04-28-2007, 10:13 PM
|
#13
|
|
Fry
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 19
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Thanks for the good stuff!!
Pete, I believe the outboard is the full height transom. It doesn't have the offshore bracket and it doesn't have a motor well so it has to be the last. I will be using the boat on the Willamette, Santiam, coastal rivers and some high lakes. I live close to the Santiam. I have a small sled now but I can't get the whole family in (including the labs) so that is why I need a larger boat. I hear that alot about the Stator. How much did that cost to replace? Also does that kill your motor when it goes and then you are stranded? What do you mean about "Optimax isn't one of Merc's most shining moments either"?
Jedcraft, where can I see your boat for sale?
To add a little to the story, the boats are,
19' Northriver with the 175 Sportsjet and the other is a 20' Fish-Rite with the 150 Optimax. Does that make a difference? They boat seem like well built boats. (I've heard bad things about Fish-Rite because my father knew Willie of Willie Boats. LOL  )
Thanks again for all the posts,
Steve
|
|
|
04-29-2007, 02:18 AM
|
#14
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toledo Wa
Posts: 4,577
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Stators are about $150.you can get good aftermarket a little cheaper.
When mine went out it would barely run below below about 2000 rpm but ran perfect above that.
They are easy to change with the right tool.
I think they couls exhibit different problems when going out.Seems like the have a high rpm side and a low rpm side.
__________________
"A man is about as big as the things that make him mad"
(unknown)
|
|
|
04-30-2007, 07:02 AM
|
#15
|
|
Sturgeon
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 3,884
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
I am 7 years in on my 19' NR Sportster with 175SJ. I can't complain about any issue aside from it being a little finicky when starting cold. It runs great and don't have any regrets.
__________________
Dr. Pepper Pro Staff
"Hunt and fish, hunt and fish...there must be more to life than this...but I hope not."
|
|
|
04-30-2007, 07:38 AM
|
#16
|
|
Steelhead
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: kelso, wash.
Posts: 474
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
I also have a 175 sportjet on a 19" northriver. As far as the noise goes, I took some 1/2" rv insulation and lined the dogbox with it. That cut the noise about 1/2. Great investment. The motor has ran great, and the cold start that is something that is common with this motor was corrected by a friend of mine with a simple wire ran dirrectly to the fuel pump. My opinion is the sportjet (175) although a little thirsty, is one solid motor.
|
|
|
04-30-2007, 08:57 AM
|
#17
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Posts: 1,375
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Had a 175 SJ in a Alumaweld Intruder for a little less than 2 years. Good boat, and decent engine but I just didn't like the inboard concept. The doghose was always in the way IMO. I had an outboard pumped sled before the SJ, so I was accustomed to lots of room in the stern. The sportjet was loud, a little smoky, but didn't cause me much grief except the first start on a really cold day. I went back to an outboard and I'm happier. I think the SJ's are a great "bang for your buck" though. I don't know much about the Opti's 'cept they had some problems on the early ones.
__________________
...."the clock looked at me just like the devil in disguise".......
|
|
|
04-30-2007, 08:59 AM
|
#18
|
|
Fry
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 19
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Thanks for everything,
I tested the Fish-Rite and liked it. I sure liked the extra room and the diamond plate floors. This boat also had a lot of extras that the previous owner knew how to set up a boat. It was a tough decision but it looks like I'm going with the Fish-Rite (if everything goes through with the credit union) I've always wanted a Northriver and may regret not getting one.
Thanks for all your opinions, see ya on the water
Steve
|
|
|
04-30-2007, 09:00 PM
|
#19
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,645
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
If you really need a jet go with the sportjet. The drawbacks are mainly sound and the loss of room from the dog house.
Fuel econmony is very good I consistantly run at 32 mph at about 8-10 gph depending on conditions. WOT is 18-19 gph and only a speed gain of about 10 mph. this is on a 20 ft hull.
I love my sportjet but as much as i fish the dog house is becoming a pain in the arse, so my next boat will be an outboard.
__________________
team tri-city chinook
|
|
|
05-05-2007, 06:26 AM
|
#20
|
|
King Salmon
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 10,102
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
On the basis of bang for the buck the 175 SJ is hard to beat.
Advantages --- Excellent power and efficiency, light weight with weight forward (less boat draft at rear), cheap compared with 200 HP outboard, reliable. Perfect for running minimum water depth (boondogging tailouts, etc.).
Disadvantages --- Cranky to start (no choke), smoky as hell when first started, buzzy loud.
__________________
Jack
Please join CCA. It took 140 years to make this mess. Together we will turn it around. Please join us.
Tillamook Anglers!!! Good people doing great things!
|
|
|
05-08-2007, 09:16 PM
|
#21
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,276
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
OB on a tiller
__________________
A man's got to believe in something... I believe I'll go fishing. - Thoreau
Most fisherman are liars, except you and me, and sometimes I doubt YOU!
Your not going to catch them sitting in the living room
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 01:50 PM
|
#22
|
|
Ifish Nate
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albany, OR
Posts: 2,165
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
I have a 175 SJ in my 98 Alumaweld intruder. Here is what I think of that combo.
* Good shallow water boat, use it on the Santiam all the time.
* Good reliable motor, never had any problems and I USE MY BOAT ALL THE TIME for all different types of fishing. From Halibut to Bass. About 150 hours a year.
* Doghouse..... Hmmm, I have mine set up as a bait station with plenty of fishing room in the back. Ive taken open seats on outboard boats and miss my bait cutting area.
* 2 stroke motor.... hard on gas.... plenty of power.... easily maintained. Pull it out of the water and you have 1/2 of the winterization done.
* Absolute only maintainence I do is change the gear box lube and stator lube.... even has origional sparkplugs though I carry spares.
* Problems: 1. Throttle cable replaced after breakage. 2. Cap for 2 stroke oil resevour replaced after breakage. 3. Idle Screw vibrated loose and raised idle way high... Like 20 mph high. This prevented shifting into the nuetral position and required turning the key off. Correction was easy and lock-tight keeps it from re-occuring.
* Would I buy again? This boat was well worth the cost. As I direct more of my time and energy twards off-shore fishing, Its a hard call. I have buddies with 4 stroke outboards that I can fish in the ocean with now... and thats the plan. A man really needs access to 4 boats... Drift, jet sled, Prop economy, and pleasure.
Last edited by Half fast Toyn; 05-20-2007 at 02:02 PM.
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 08:43 PM
|
#23
|
|
Cutthroat
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 34
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Quote:
Originally Posted by kelso
I also have a 175 sportjet on a 19" northriver. As far as the noise goes, I took some 1/2" rv insulation and lined the dogbox with it. That cut the noise about 1/2. Great investment. The motor has ran great, and the cold start that is something that is common with this motor was corrected by a friend of mine with a simple wire ran dirrectly to the fuel pump. My opinion is the sportjet (175) although a little thirsty, is one solid motor.
|
Kelso
Would like to hear the details on fixing the hard to start when cold on the 175 .
Thanks Charlie
|
|
|
05-25-2007, 07:23 AM
|
#24
|
|
Tuna!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,764
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
I went through the same process a few years ago. I know a lot of guys over here who have had major problems with the sportjet. Engine problems.
With that in mind I went OB. It is really nice to kick it up when you have sucked up a chunk of moss in the dark. Couple of scrapes and away you go.
The cost of a sportjet is cheaper than OB. They are deafening. They are pretty fast.
I have an 80HP JET on my Alaskan Wooldridge. I might die still owning this boat. I have never said that about a boat before.
Duckwheat
__________________
Another 1200, and I might be done.
|
|
|
05-25-2007, 12:30 PM
|
#25
|
|
Steelhead
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: kelso, wash.
Posts: 474
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Charlie H, yes I would like to hear what you have to say about the cold start.
Kelso
|
|
|
05-25-2007, 02:24 PM
|
#26
|
|
Ifish Nate
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bonneville dam
Posts: 2,757
|
Re: Outboard vs Sportsjet
Cold start is not much of an issue! once the mod has been done!
__________________
 If it isn't fickle then it isn't a pickle!!! Member of the 12' boat club! Small Boat Huge Fish or SBHF
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|