Re: TREATY
That sounds like a great idea CTS! It might be hard to pull off that kind of support, but it could be very interesting. This is not an anti-Indian issue. It is about non-conformance to Treaties (agreeing to "share fish in common with" - between Indians and non-Indians) and misinterpretation by the Fed. courts (saying that meant to give the minority Indians 50% of all fish deemed harvestable and 50% to all non-Indian fishers, which includes commercial netters). And worse yet, the Fed.s are now giving the Indians even more than what was directed by court ordered decisions on the Treaties. And some Indians are taking more than what has already been unfairly given to them. It's an outrage! - Use our search feature to look up posts on Treaties. Someone posted actual copies of some of the Treaties with NW Tribes. Does anyone remember the name of that post? - RT
[This message has been edited by RT (edited 08-31-2000).]
|