Go Back   www.ifish.net > Ifish Fishing and Hunting > Ifish Hunting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2004, 09:07 PM   #1
elkaholic
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NE Orygun
Posts: 433
Default Losing hunting opportunities to wolves?

As you can see from the latest counts (See article below) near Yellowstone, hunters are likely going to be eliminated from herd management equation. Do you want that to happen here? Better let ODFW Commission know your thoughts as they make a "plan". We should learn from what is happening to our neighbors.

It's all part of the Defenders of Wildlife and others plan, get rid of hunters/hunting and public lands grazers.


Elk numbers plummet; wildlife managers respond by regulating hunters

By SCOTT McMILLION, Chronicle Staff Writer
LIVINGSTON -- Elk numbers continue to plummet in the northern Yellowstone elk herd, according to a report released late Tuesday.

The herd is now the smallest it's been since the 1970s.

A Dec. 18 flight by state and federal biologists found 8,355 elk despite "relatively good survey conditions," which means good weather and enough snow to make elk visible from the air.

That's a drop of at least 880 elk, or 9.5 percent, from last year's count of 9,215, when conditions were poor and biologists said they probably missed a lot of elk.

The herd has dropped by an average of 6 percent a year since 1994, when the herd had at least 19,359 elk. That timespan coincides with the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park in 1995.

"Wolves are certainly a primary mortality factor" for elk, said P.J. White, a Yellowstone wildlife biologist.

Another big factor is human predation, especially in the annual Gardiner-area late hunt. But unlike wolves, which are protected by the Endangered Species Act, hunter numbers can be restricted.

Regulating hunting numbers "is the only tool we have" in that area, said Tom Lemke, wildlife biologist in Livingston for the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

The late hunt that began last weekend has already been cut in half, and might be pared some more, Lemke said. This year, 1,400 permits were granted, compared to 2,880 in 1997.

Lemke said it's too soon to give any specific numbers, but "it's possible we will reduce them" further in coming years.

"When you have fewer elk, you harvest fewer," Lemke said.

White said the herd size probably will continue to shrink.

"I expect the population will continue to decrease in the near future," he said.

The effect of wolves on elk has become a big issue with some hunters and outfitters in the Gardiner area.

Fewer late-season hunters means fewer people renting rooms, buying meals and hiring guides in that parkside community, where the late hunt has become part of the winter economy.

"It's breaking us," said Bill Hoppe, a Jardine outfitter and a founder of the Friends of the Northern Yellowstone Elk Herd.
He said he has 40 hunters booked this year.
"I used to take 100, sometimes 150," he said. "All the outfitters you talk to are way down."

With the cuts in permits, "that's 1,000 people who didn't come to town," Hoppe said, and most hunters bring a companion.

If each spent $100 in Gardiner, that means $200,000 in lost business, plus the $200 a day charged by guides.

Last year, guided hunters took almost 50 percent of the 718 elk harvested in the late hunt, according to an FWP report.

Hoppe last year predicted a significant drop in elk numbers and said they'll continue to fall.

"What'd I say last year? That we'd be down another 1,000 elk," he said. "Like I told you last year: I told you so."

So how many elk is appropriate for the northern range? People have argued about that for most of a century.

Until 1968, rangers regularly killed hundreds of elk at at time inside the park, keeping the herd to about 3,500 animals, and critics still said the park was overgrazed.

After the National Park Service culling stopped, the herd grew quickly. And the number of hunting permits outside the park grew as well, with the goal of avoiding overgrazing outside the park.

Now, since the return of the wolf, the herd has seen a steady decline.

Nobody knows how it will end. "We'll continue to monitor it closely," White said. He noted that wolves aren't the only factor at play.

Preliminary reviews of data collected last summer show that grizzly bears are killing an increasing number of elk calves. Black bears and wolves also kill significant numbers. And weather is always a factor.

But of the three major factors affecting elk numbers -- predation, weather and hunting -- only hunting can be controlled.

White praised FWP for reducing the number of hunters. "I commend them for taking that step," he said.
elkaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 06:35 AM   #2
Bait O' Eggs
King Salmon
 
Bait O' Eggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amity
Posts: 11,609
Default Re: Losing hunting opportunities to wolves?

Well that data must be wrong How can the herd be down 9.5% the charts graphs and college educated type say the wolf only takes 2% and those are the weak and sick 2%. They just need to go back and re-evaluate their data that soft cuddly little wolf cant be behind this.

Shoot shovel and shut up as long as the regulating agency listens to the other side
__________________
I married better than my wife did!!
As time goes on, I find less and less people I care to be around
Bait O' Eggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 08:09 AM   #3
Mojo
Ifish Nate
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waaaaay upriver...
Posts: 2,358
Default Re: Losing hunting opportunities to wolves?

You have to remember the last 5 years we have had a devestation drought in this region as well. Elk numbers iin the South Hills as well as Deer numbers in the Owyhees are down about 20% over the last 6 years. Aren't to many wolves in those regions. Too many fast shovelers :grin: . I'm just saying that the quick conclusions may not be 100% accurate.
__________________
Mojo
TEAM MOOSE DROOL
30 Stones and a Steak Prostaff
Mojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 09:27 PM   #4
Gun Rod Bow
 
Gun Rod Bow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sherwood, OR
Posts: 8,387
Default Re: Losing hunting opportunities to wolves?

It's already happening here and people still think it'll be cool to have wolves in this state

This is from the Oregonian: 10/26/03

RICHARD COCKLE

JOSEPH -- Cougars have killed so many Rocky Mountain elk in Wallowa County that only 360 tags for antlerless elk are being offered to hunters this year, down from 4,140 just eight years ago....

Here's the link: http://www.oregonlive.com/news/orego...8362939070.xml

Wake up you guys. Predators will absolutely replace sport hunting in this state if we let the anti-hunters follow through with their plans to increase predators so WE can be replaced by them.
__________________
Now Jeff wants to be like me

If we shouldn't eat animals, why are they made of meat?
Gun Rod Bow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 10:00 PM   #5
ORoutdoorsman
Steelhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 163
Default Re: Losing hunting opportunities to wolves?

The problem with what there people are trying to do, is they they are trying to re-introduce these species that existed in a world completely different from the one we live in now. The eco system they are trying to recreate does not exist anymore. The animal populations we have now in most of the country are those that people have created and regulated. We do not have the same numbers of animals, we do not have the same amount of land, and we have animals that are living in non-native habitats. The arguement that wolves and other animals co-existed with each other no longer applies, because we are no longer in the world where they co-existed. And this is not the result of hunters. It is the result of urbanization and growing populations. And the problem is, that even without hunters, thriving wolf populations pose a threat to the populations of most big game animals. Reintroducing wolves, especially in oregon, is not a realistic idea. Because you are not reintroducing them to their natural habitat, you are introducing them to a habitat where animals are living in smaller areas, having larger amount of animals confined to smaller areas due to lack of land to roam. This means that wolves have large amounts of food in an area, and animals have no options of spreading out, which is good for wolves and bad for everything else. You are also introducing them to a habitat full of animal that are non-native. Most of the elk, turkey, and all ringneck pheasants were introduced to the areas in which they currently reside. With the introduction of wolves, you can all but kiss east side hunting goodbye. As well as risking the elimination of columbia whitetail. WHile my outlook on wolves in Oregon may be a grim one, I think we stand to lose alot, including out hunting rights, if we introduce wolves to this 21st century habitat.
ORoutdoorsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 06:23 AM   #6
TAILOUT
Chromer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: gresham
Posts: 724
Default Re: Losing hunting opportunities to wolves?

One individual wolf is responsible for the consumption of 1.8 elk per mnth during the winter mnths. That isnt including the spring when all the yearling are born. That adds up to over 20 elk a year. :whazzup:
__________________
Fish on!!!
TAILOUT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Cast to



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:21 AM.

Terms of Service
Page generated in 0.07617 seconds with 10 queries