View Full Version : Deschutes Closure being challenged *DELETED*
raftpete
07-28-2005, 05:55 PM
Post deleted by raftpete
Blue Tip Spinner
07-29-2005, 11:10 AM
great job and thank you for letting us know. i didn't know there was an issue over there!!!!
FYI- you might want to edit out your PH# so some wierdo doesn't call you at 3am.
Rank Amateur
07-30-2005, 01:06 AM
I saw this mentioned on my kayaking forum, never could tell that anybody really got cited. Some boaters in the area talked to a deputy and he said they were not going to cite anybody, because the river was a highway for boaters. May have been somebody left the river and got onto private property.
Whiskey Dick
08-01-2005, 07:10 PM
Hugh said it was ok to copy this post to ifish,
"Had a very cordial and pleasant conversation with Sheriff Les Stiles of Deschutes County about law enforcement and river rights. He informed me that nobody will be arrested for trespass if they are fishing below the ordinary high water mark and have accessed the Deschutes River via public property (or private property with permission).
As far as rafts and kayaks go, bumping a rock mid-stream while passing between private banks is not trespassing. Once again, you are below the ordinary high water mark.
About the only way you could get arrested is to trespass on private property and have the property owner complain and press charges.
Sheriff Stiles is a fisherman who enjoys swinging a fly for steelhead below Sherar's Falls. He was glad to have an opportunity to put this misconception to rest.
Keep in mind, though, that private property owners (Like Deschutes River Ranch) may see things a little differently and try to run someone off. You have to make your own decisions, and this thread is just to let you all know that the Deschutes River Sheriff's Office is enforcing the law within the AG's April 2005 guildelines.
One other thing: This is just a personal feeling I have, but it might be wise not to push the "ordinary high water mark" boundary. Don't take liberties with private property thinking you're protected by the law. In other words, stay in safe territory. We can do no less for the folks who own the land adjacent to the waters we want to be on.
TL, Hugh "
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------