Snagly
11-27-2001, 12:56 AM
I've loved fishing for steelhead since I caught a fresh spring run almost six years ago (on a plug out of a guide's boat). Since then I've caught steelhead on a variety of methods and continue to enjoy experimenting. On the other hand, there are certain very productive types of fishing (e.g. plugging) that I don't use very much simply because the skill required from the angler (vs. the boatman) isn't as great.
So my question for the Board is "How much (more) do you value catching a steelhead on one method vs. another?"
For example, in Alaska we used to fly fish exclusively. It's what caught the most fish so there wasn't any snobbery. Then two years ago I started fishing jigs in deeper holes. Now I drift the river with a fly rod and a jig rod. But because it's harder to cast and detect the take with the fly rod, a fly rod caught fish is in my mind worth more than a jig caught fish. For me it takes an 11 lb jig & float fish to equal an 8 lb fish on a fly. (I'm not saying that this is the way it really is -- I'm just sharing how I feel.)
If I had to take a stab at it, I guess my "enjoyment breakeven" numbers are somewhere along the following lines:
20lbs: Guided and plugging
14lbs: Guided and casting gear
11lbs: Guided and using flies or using a new lure
11lbs: Unguided and using gear
8lbs: Unguided and using flies or using a new lure
Explanations:
If we are talking about extremely large fish -- say, 25 lbs and up, then I'm likely to be much more appreciative of them even if it was a guide that put me on to them! (In that case a self-guided 20 lber might compare with a guided 25 lber.)
I'm increasingly appreciating that finding the fish is harder than figuring out what they'll bite. Reading water is hard for me, so I place a premium on finding my own spots vs. being shown a good slot by a guide. (This is also the reason I ALWAYS use a guide the first day or two when fishing unknown water: I enjoy the challenge, but I'd rather learn where the fish hold and maybe catch a couple than try out my pet theories from different rivers.)
I also don't use plugs on my own very often, and never from a drift boat so I consider them to be just another lure when I'm on my own
I don't fly fish particularly well, so I place a premium on using flies (usually swinging wets or high stick dead drifting)
I love catching fish on something new even if it isn't technically difficult to present.
I fish where there are bait bans so bait doesn't apply.
Then there are the separate but equally subjective questions of "How many fish do you have to hook/ land for it to meet your defintion of a 'great day'?" Is there some sort of trade-off in size vs. numbers? "Does it take two 10 lb'ers to equal one 15 lb steelhead in terms of satisfaction? How many 15 lb fish equal a 20 lb'er?"
Well, it's clear I don't have enough to do at the office today . . . .
So my question for the Board is "How much (more) do you value catching a steelhead on one method vs. another?"
For example, in Alaska we used to fly fish exclusively. It's what caught the most fish so there wasn't any snobbery. Then two years ago I started fishing jigs in deeper holes. Now I drift the river with a fly rod and a jig rod. But because it's harder to cast and detect the take with the fly rod, a fly rod caught fish is in my mind worth more than a jig caught fish. For me it takes an 11 lb jig & float fish to equal an 8 lb fish on a fly. (I'm not saying that this is the way it really is -- I'm just sharing how I feel.)
If I had to take a stab at it, I guess my "enjoyment breakeven" numbers are somewhere along the following lines:
20lbs: Guided and plugging
14lbs: Guided and casting gear
11lbs: Guided and using flies or using a new lure
11lbs: Unguided and using gear
8lbs: Unguided and using flies or using a new lure
Explanations:
If we are talking about extremely large fish -- say, 25 lbs and up, then I'm likely to be much more appreciative of them even if it was a guide that put me on to them! (In that case a self-guided 20 lber might compare with a guided 25 lber.)
I'm increasingly appreciating that finding the fish is harder than figuring out what they'll bite. Reading water is hard for me, so I place a premium on finding my own spots vs. being shown a good slot by a guide. (This is also the reason I ALWAYS use a guide the first day or two when fishing unknown water: I enjoy the challenge, but I'd rather learn where the fish hold and maybe catch a couple than try out my pet theories from different rivers.)
I also don't use plugs on my own very often, and never from a drift boat so I consider them to be just another lure when I'm on my own
I don't fly fish particularly well, so I place a premium on using flies (usually swinging wets or high stick dead drifting)
I love catching fish on something new even if it isn't technically difficult to present.
I fish where there are bait bans so bait doesn't apply.
Then there are the separate but equally subjective questions of "How many fish do you have to hook/ land for it to meet your defintion of a 'great day'?" Is there some sort of trade-off in size vs. numbers? "Does it take two 10 lb'ers to equal one 15 lb steelhead in terms of satisfaction? How many 15 lb fish equal a 20 lb'er?"
Well, it's clear I don't have enough to do at the office today . . . .