PDA

View Full Version : WA state smallie to be recognized as new record


HOOKUP
09-16-2006, 11:31 PM
by Andy Walgamott, Washington Fishing & Hunting News

A 9.32-pound smallmouth bass caught by a Kennewick angler earlier this month is the new state record.

“We’re going to go ahead and recognize it as a record,” said WDFW angler education specialist Keith Underwood, who maintains state records, this morning.

“Right on!” said Austin Kenyon, 22, when he heard the news around noon today. “Phew, no complications. Yah!”

The 22-year-old angler caught the smallie while bank fishing on the lower Yakima River Sept. 2 with a plastic grub.

“It hit my line so hard I thought I had a carp on,” he told F&H News yesterday.

Fishing partner Laura Herin, who was there when Austin hooked it that Saturday afternoon, says he was very excited to catch the huge fish.

“It was definitely bigger than a football,” she says.

It tops a 40-year-old record, Ray Wonacott’s 1966 Hanford Reach smallie, by 9 ounces.

Underwood was filling out final paperwork and forwarding it to Director Jeff Koening for his signature this afternoon.

WANTS TO GO PRO: A rabid angler, Kenyon says his technique is to “jig, jig, jig” his lure and then let it sit.

“The longer you let it sit, the more likely it is to be bit,” he says.

Kenyon landed his big fish on a Shimano reel and ultralight rod, 8-pound Stren line and a Yamamoto pumpkin-green grub.

He also likes 7-inch YUM green-pumpkin lizards. He snaps their legs off and fishes the tail.

“I’m a very dedicated fisherman. I go out there every single day. I love fishing. I want to be sponsored ... I want to go out in pro tournaments,” the material handler for Apollo Sheet Metal says.

UNUSUAL WEIGHT FOR SIZE: Perhaps the bass downstream of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation have different densities than those elsewhere, or the formulas designed to figure out fish weight can’t account for local variations, but what’s puzzling WDFW and local bass anglers is that Kenyon’s fish is somehow heavier than other fish its size.

“The measurements don’t fit,” says Underwood, referring to standard length-times-girth formulas used to weigh bass.

Three different formulas, which use slightly different calculations, put the fish at 6.65 pounds, 6.85 pounds and 7.95 pounds, he says.

However, Underwood says the fish has a very large belly, and that biologist Paul Hoffarth and a taxidermist at the Kennewick Sportsman’s Warehouse could find no evidence of lead or anything shoved into the fish’s stomach.

“It didn’t appear there was any distortion in the gut ... Paul remarked that the fish felt exceptionally heavy,” Underwood says.

He adds that there is no evidence of fraud.

“We know there are fish that come through that area that are pretty good size,” Underwood says.

Adds Kenyon on the lower Yakima’s bass, “They’re just fat, but not long.”

In fact, there just might be something in the water that’s creating short but incredibly stout fish in this area.

Underwood notes that Wonacott’s 1966 record smallie displays the same characteristics as Kenyon’s bass.

“Its weight was heavier than its size,” he says. Wonacott’s fish was 2 inches shorter, but just 4 ounces under the 9-pound mark.

However, it was also caught in the spring (April 23), when hen bass are typically fat with eggs.

RECORD RE-EVALUATION: Still, the oddity of Kenyon’s bass is forcing the state to re-evaluate how much information is required for potential state records.

“This particular fish is causing us to review our records,” says Underwood. “What we’re going to be doing is look at our record-keeping process.”

While there is a space on Washington’s record application form for a biologist to mark down fish length and girth, records are awarded by weight alone.

“This one is tipping the scale, telling us something is wrong ... How can something that’s 22 inches long and 17 inches around weigh so much?” Underwood says.

“This one does have a pretty good-sized gut. It looks like there’s a softball in there,” he says.

Underwood’s quick to add that standing records would not be revised.

He also says he will bring the issue up with colleagues during a conference at an Arkansas bass hatchery.

“It’ll be a good place to have a talk about this issue,” he says.

FROZEN STATUS CLEARED UP: Underwood says the only way they could disqualify the bass is because it was frozen, which Kenyon readily admits occurred.

The application for state records reads, “Frozen fish will not be accepted for weighing.”

“But this fish was thawed before weighing,” Underwood notes.

Kenyon says he had to freeze it because it was Labor Day weekend. He wasn’t able to bring it in to state offices until Sept. 6.

The regulation against frozen fish is designed to keep out-of-state fish out of the record books, says Underwood.

Potential records can be weighed at certified scales which can be found at most if not all grocers’ meat and produce departments.

Official instructions can be found here: http://wdfw.wa.gov/outreach/fishing/bigfishapplication.pdf

Dave Smith
09-17-2006, 09:35 AM
Well, I don't know what to say. In reading the article it makes so many references to something being "wrong" and that in the future they will do this and that to prevent this from happening?!??? It will be too late!!!! No one will ever catch a smallmouth heavier than this one so this will stand as the record. For all the dedicated bass fisherman in WA state, the hunt is over- the dream is over- there is practically no way you will ever break the WA state record. You may catch a larger fish, but it won't be heavier and will therefore be useless in this department.
Our own Superfluke's smallmouth was exactly 24 inches long and 18 inches around. I measured it myself and I have an exact reproduction of it that I am making for him. This makes it quite a bit larger than the WA state record, but over 1 POUND lighter. It not rocket surgery, something is terribly WRONG. No matter what, though: Austin's fish is a great fish and he made a great catch- not quite sure if it's time to go "PRO", but nice work on this awesome fish. Dave

Knot in leader
09-17-2006, 12:46 PM
:yeahthat:
Something fishy is going on around here :twocents:

Super Fluke
09-17-2006, 04:21 PM
:yeahthat:

HOOKUP
09-17-2006, 11:58 PM
the game dept. is going off this kids credibility. he did not hide the fact he froze it and did not want to reveal what he caught it on. The kid was totally naive about the promotional value of the fish, including aquariums that might have wanted to buy it.

And one more comment apparently the WDFW sampled a 10 lb + smallie on the snake within the last 2 years.

Dave Smith
09-18-2006, 09:24 AM
the game dept. is going off this kids credibility. he did not hide the fact he froze it and did not want to reveal what he caught it on. The kid was totally naive about the promotional value of the fish, including aquariums that might have wanted to buy it.

And one more comment apparently the WDFW sampled a 10 lb + smallie on the snake within the last 2 years.



**Every year there is a claim or two of the new state record. Should we just "go off all of these people's "credibility""?
**I can also tell how naive mister "I'm going PRO" was about the fish's promotional value.
**You cannot sell a gamefish.
**10 pound smallie sampled?? We hear it every year, yet somehow the WDFW doesn't know anything about it.

Basscaster
09-18-2006, 01:18 PM
I'm not going to use one of those "Yeah That" signs, but I have to say I agree with Dave. Something doesn't sound right here. Even the bioligist and the taxidermist are baffled?

Knot in leader
09-18-2006, 05:40 PM
I've thought about it and I'm guessing the fish was altered some way before being weighed. After it was weighed and certified the fish was fixed back before the WDFW saw it.
Just doesn't add up :shrug: Still a hawg of a smallmouth Bass but not a record. :twocents:

raptorschild
09-19-2006, 10:51 AM
You know what really irkes me about this record. "Frozen fish will not be accepted for weighing." Case closed NO RECORD. NOOOOOO REEECCCCCCOOOOORRRRDDDDDDDD!

*** "The regulation against frozen fish is designed to keep out-of-state fish out of the record books", says Underwood

***“But this fish was thawed before weighing,” Underwood notes.

[celery sticks!] is this about???? How does he know the fish wasnt caught in Mexico for gawd sakes. I still havent seen a picture of the kid pulling it out of the Yak with some background or geological features to prove anything!



I don't want to sound like i'm hating here, but rules are rules, and they are in place for a reason. Who are these wildlife officials to make changes because of "credibility" or any other issues for that matter. It plainly states that the fish was frozen. I think the Wildlife officers are interpreting the rules as being you can't weigh a frozen fish. I don't think the rule is meant to be that literal. When you freeze a fish, it is not going to be the same after the fact. It theoretically should weigh less, but freezing a fish gives people more time and more chance to tamper with it. I wonder if they in fact X-rayed the fish. No one actually mentions that in the article.

This is unfortunate for all parties. The kid who caught the fish, and may or may not have broke the record, and for fisherman in the future trying to get there name up in lights.


Dave i think you are wrong though. Records are made to be broken, and i don't care how big the fish was/wasn't, There is always one bigger out there! Gotta remember this is downstream from a facility that helped manufactur fat man, and little boy.

Hunt'nFish
09-19-2006, 05:48 PM
:yeahthat:
Something fishy is going on around here :twocents:


Yeah....must be the uranium crawfish! :shrug: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Dave Smith
09-20-2006, 09:35 AM
Here's one for ya: (100% true story) Two years ago a guy catches the new Arizona State record LM. He goes to the lake scales and the scales are closed like they almost always are when you need them (common in CA), so his choices are to kill the fish and drive it to the nearest scales, or keep it alive in his livewell and then drive back to the lake and release it after weighing. He opts to do the right thing and not kill the fish and the record is "not recognized" because he transported a live fish across land. Unbelievable. Where was the "rule bending" then? How could the DNR know or proove the fish was alive and not dead? they had to go on the guy's word and "credibilty". Couldn't they recognize the record (because it IS) and write him a ticket? The company that manufactures the hook he was using was offering $50,000 to anyone catching a state record on their hooks- they denied him, also.